Jihad Watch : Writes Henda Ayari: “I have been silent for several years for fear of
reprisals, because by threatening to file a complaint for the rape of
which I was a victim, he did not hesitate to threaten me and also tell
me that we could ‘take it to my children.’ I was afraid and I kept
silent all this time.”
Tariq Ramadan, hailed as a Muslim reformer despite not rejecting any
tenet of Qur’anic Islam, is the grandson of Muslim Brotherhood founder
Hasan al-Banna. Ramadan is renowned as a “moderate” and never identified
with the outlook or policies of al-Banna, despite the fact that Ramadan
has praised and never repudiated his grandfather. With these threats,
if Ayari’s allegations are true, Ramadan does appear to be a true
exponent of the Muslim Brotherhood.“French author Henda Ayari accuses Tariq Ramadan of rape,” Middle East Eye, October 20, 2017:
French author Henda Ayari accused on Friday philosopher
and Islamic theoretician Tariq Ramadan of rape. Ayari, 40, said that the
influential academic had sexually assaulted her in a hotel room in
Paris in 2012. “I decided to file a complaint against Tariq Ramadan for what he did
to me,” she said on Facebook. Ramadan has not yet responded to the
Ayari said she was raped by the UK-based academic on the sidelines of
the congress of the Union of Islamic Organisations of France when he
allegedly invited her to join him in a hotel room. She also claims that Ramadan threatened her family to prevent her reporting the alleged rape. “I have been silent for several years for fear of reprisals, because
by threatening to file a complaint for the rape of which I was a victim,
he did not hesitate to threaten me and also tell me that we could ‘take
it to my children.’ I was afraid and I kept silent all this time,” she
said on Facebook.
Ayari’s lawyer, Jonas Haddad told Le Figaro that his client had filed
a complaint for “rape, sexual assault, voluntary violence, harassment,
intimidation” with the Rouen prosecutor’s office on Friday afternoon. AFP also reported that it had seen legal documents detailing the complaint. Ramadan, 55, who is a professor of Contemporary Islamic Studies at
Oxford University, is the grandson of the founder of the Muslim
Brotherhood and is enormously influential among Muslims throughout
He calls for believers to embrace and practice Islam in a thoroughly
modern manner, and he advises Muslims on how they can fully integrate
into European societies without betraying the universal laws and values
of Islam. His books include “What I Believe” and “Radical Reform,
Islamic Ethics and Liberation”.
However, critics accuse Ramadan of anti-Semitism and promoting the oppression of women, claims that he denies.
Tariq Ramadan and Harvey Weinstein: Brothers Under the Skin
Jihad Watch : Six years ago, I wrote about another scandal starring Tariq Ramadan,
the scandal of his Boughten Professorship at Oxford.
I think now is the
appropriate time to re-post it. The defender of the Muslim Brotherhood,
founded by his beloved grandfather, Tariq Ramadan is the sweetly
sinister taqiyya tosser and Defender of the Faith, possibly to be
brought down not because of all that, but because he turns out,
according to his accuser, a fellow Muslim (she was once a fervent Salafi
who has seen the light) to be guilty of “rape, sexual assault,
voluntary violence, harassment, intimidation.” Well, Al Capone was
finally locked up, not for extortion or murder, but for tax evasion. Any
port in a storm.
If he puts you in mind of Harvey Weinstein, do remember that Harvey
Weinstein, unbelievably awful as he is, never threatened the way Tariq
Ramadan is said to have threatened the children of his victim (“take it
to the children”); nor did he slap anyone around, the way Tariq Ramadan
is said to have done. Oh what the hell, let’s think of them as brothers
under the skin. Convivencia! Why should Tariq Ramadan be sentenced according to the laws of French Unbelievers?
Jihad Watch : Now that Tariq Ramadan has been accused of rape, it is useful to recall just how profound the thinking of this renowned intellectual really is. Hugh just posted some illuminating revelations
about Tariq Ramadan’s scholarship and academic appointments, and this
article I wrote back in 2012, “Deep Thoughts from Tariq Ramadan,” shows
that he needed those special breaks to get his professorships, because
his intellectual level is generally about that of a Hallmark card.
Ramadan and his ilk are appointed and applauded and lauded by the
academic and media elites because they retail the lies that those elites
want us to believe, not because they are actually competent
intellectuals. Did Tariq Ramadan punctuate his slaps and threats to Henda Ayari with
deep musings whispered in her ear such as “Near to you or without you.
Why do we love? Why do we break apart? Why, indeed?”
Deep Thoughts from Tariq Ramadan
Reza Aslan, the immature young apologist for the Islamic Republic of Iran and Sharia oppression,
recently bragged in a tweet about being among the “people that press
actually takes seriously.” But how does the “press” select those whom it
“actually takes seriously”? Does it undertake a rigorous selection
process, weighing the intellectual heft of a public figure’s writings
and statements, determining whether they stand up to logical and factual
scrutiny, and have something of benefit to convey to the public? Of
course not: increasingly the figures whom the mainstream media lauds as
voices of wisdom are simply those who parrot today’s dominant Leftist
talking points, no matter how bereft of substance they may be.
COMMENT | MCA publicity chief
Chai Kim Sen made two rather disingenuous statements regarding the
arrest of the teenage bombmaker and his cohorts. The first was
oppositional types should apologise for casting doubts on the
credibility of the state security apparatus on their claims that there
were elements out to violently disrupt the beer festival, and the second
was there were some rights that should be sacrificed in order to
protect other rights and freedoms.
Non-Malays are irrelevant to Malaysia’s future - By Commander (Rtd) S THAYAPARAN Royal Malaysian Navy
Wednesday, October 18, 2017
Malaysiakini : “Bulls**t is the glue that binds us as a nation.” ― George Carlin
COMMENT | I cannot recall where
exactly I read this but in one those surveys that ask people how far
they self-identify with certain concepts, Indians by far identified as
“Malaysians”. I have no idea if the Indians taking that survey were
fooling the survey takers or fooling themselves. Then again, I know next
to nothing about what it means to be “Malaysian”.
So the survey that the Oriental Daily
carried out asking Chinese respondents a whole bunch of questions
struck me as rather funny. I mean if the majority valued good governance
over the economy and equality than why would the issue of the treatment
of non-Malays as second-class citizens be a major issue – as evidenced
by the rhetoric of opposition politicians and their followers – in the
current political landscape?
Anyway, all this is not important anyway. The only relevance the
non-Malay community - and by this I mean the Chinese community - is to
provide some semblance of an oppositional block in this country. The
Indian community (as a voting block) is irrelevant and is merely window
dressing to show some form of inclusiveness for mainstream political
power structures or in some rare instances as “kingmakers” in close
The enemies of our secular state - By Commander (Rtd) S THAYAPARAN Royal Malaysian Navy
Monday, October 16, 2017
Malaysiakini : “What the State can usefully do is to
make itself a central depository, and active circulator and diffuser, of
the experience resulting from many trials. Its business is to enable
each experimentalist to benefit by the experiments of others, instead of
tolerating no experiments but its own.” – John Stuart Mill, “On Liberty”
Malaysiakini columnist P Gunasegeram ends his latest piece, ‘I am a pendatang and proud of it,”
with the appropriate “And know that I am here to stay whether you
bloody like it or not because this country is mine too!” which is
exactly how most non-Malay/Muslims feel whenever they read about the use
of the weaponised Islam in this country.
All you have to do is read the comments on social media when Johor’s
Sultan Ibrahim Sultan Iskandar stands up for what is right and decent
when it comes to countering the agendas of Islamists in this country who
would use religion as a demarcation line between Malaysians to
understand the frustrations non-Malays have with a system that on the
one hand, finds utilitarian value in non-Malay contribution to this
country and on the other, is disgusted by their very existence as
Malaysians with hopes and agendas of their own. These agendas are not
necessarily different from each other but are anathema to the agendas of
these state-sponsored Islamists.
People often miss the larger narrative when it is easier to digest
soundbites. When a religious school burns down, this should have been an
opportunity for a national discussion on why these religious schools
exists in the first, what values they are promoting, how safe are they
and the corrupt practices that goes in the creation and maintenance of
these schools. Instead, nobody was really interested in this but carried
on putting all their eggs in the 1MDB basket.
Here’s Ann Coulter’s scathing attack on Hollywood over Weinstein sex scandal
Right-wing firebrand Ann Coulter took to her Twitter account to launch a scathing rhetorical attack on Hollywood for their hypocrisy in looking the other way for decades as movie mogul Harvey Weinstein sexually harassed women.
Lucifer, the light-bearer. Not perhaps since the fall of the original
archetype has there been such a fall as Harvey Weinstein’s (or “God,”
as Meryl Streep described him). For it is not just the fall, it is the
place from which he fell, the very mount of the modern temple itself:
Hollywood, elite of the elites, kingdom of fame, fortune and
cosmetology, the greatest machine for self-infatuation and ostentatious
sanctimony ever conceived of by the mind of man. Hollywood, the
nuclear-fired power plant of virtue-signalling, where every good liberal
cause comes with its own swag bag, and progressive posturing is a
lifestyle honed to an art form, where greed wrestles daily with vanity.
It’s possibly the only place on Earth where Hypocrisy is occasionally
ashamed of itself.
The Award for Can This Pit Get Much Deeper?: Ben Affleck! After Gigli one
would have thought all depths had been sounded, but Affleck had to come
out minutes after “deploring” Weinstein’s grotesques habits and hobbies
with an apology for his own gropes and grabs years past. As a Ms.
Annamarie Tendler elegantly twittered: “I would also love to get an
apology from Ben Affleck who grabbed my ass at a Golden Globes party in
2014.” The slab of rancid icing on the cake is a Variety story
wondering whether the “box office” for the new Justice League movie
which Affleck’s infects might also suffer.
Now there’s the real issue. The Hey, Ben — Room Down There For One More? Award: Jimmy Kimmel. The latest Joel Osteen of the late night preacher/comics, Kimmel was also the onetime host of the Man Show.
He is now on tape from those pre-preachers days taking part in a crude
gag where he invites young females to feel his zucchini-stuffed crotch
with such delicacies as: “How old are you?” When she answers,
“Eighteen,” he asks, “You sure of that? Cause old Jimmy doesn’t need to
do time … Maybe it would be easier if you put your mouth on it.” Donald
Trump is such a vulgarian.
Some more bullshit, inventing history - Swedish researcher claims Viking burial clothes bear the name “Allah” in Arabic
Jihad Watch : History always trumps fairy tales. How far will the academic Islamopandering go? Apparently there is no
limit, no matter how ridiculous it gets. This latest outbreak is
receiving adoring international publicity, and has been uncritically
accepted, such that immediately the Vikings have all become Muslim, and
all their exploits are to be attributed to Islam.
The big story here is that the name “Allah” in Kufic Arabic script
has been found on tenth-century Viking burial clothes. Here is what is
on the garment:
And here is “Allah” in square Kufic script:
Here is another square Kufic “Allah,” with the terminal ha rendered more like the Viking burial image:
So that’s that, right? As Jihad Watch reader David puts it, “So the
Islamisation of Scandinavia is a natural, laudable, and above all
inevitable process: the Nordic peoples are ‘coming home’ to their
ancestral belief in the one, the only True Religion.”
Maybe, but not so fast. In the first place, the square Kufic “Allah”
is essentially some straight lines and a square. The Viking burial
clothes could have happened upon a similar design by sheer happenstance;
the word is not intricate or unusual enough to rule that out. Also,
here is the whole image published in the Daily Mail:
Note the swastika at the top of the image (interestingly enough, the BBC cut the swastika out of the image in their story on this).
A foreshadowing of the Mufti of Jerusalem and the Nazi/Islamic
collaboration of World War II? No. The swastika was an ancient Norse
image for the sun. But it was not an Islamic image. So even if the
burial clothes do say “Allah,” the Vikings were not Muslim, because if
they had been, they wouldn’t be employing the symbols of jahiliyya, the pre-Islamic period of ignorance.
What’s more, look at the bottom of the image. Presumably the symbols
there, next to the supposed “Allah,” are just a bit of ornamental
design. But there are four crosses in that ornamental design. Just
ornamental, or indicative of a Christian influence as well? Wouldn’t a
Muslim be careful not to include crosses in the embroidery? If
they really are Christian crosses, and there is no way that possibility
can be dismissed out of hand, then this is yet more indication that even
if the three-lines-a-hook-and-a-square symbol is “Allah” in Arabic,
this is more likely to be the burial cloth of a syncretistic,
superstitious Viking who wanted to placate all the deities, not of a
Muslim. But that possibility doesn’t fit the modern mania to see the hand of Islam everywhere, so it will not be considered.
Parting question: is the design on the famous Greek diner coffee cup a
variant of the square Kufic “Allah”? Are Greek diner owners actually
“Were Vikings influenced by ISLAM? Arabic embroidery bearing the name
‘Allah’ is uncovered on 10th Century Norse burial clothes,” by Tim
Collins, Mailonline, October 12, 2017:
Why was Zamihan really arrested? - By Commander (Rtd) S THAYAPARAN Royal Malaysian Navy
Malaysiakini : “The spectacle of what is called
religion, or at any rate organised religion, in India and elsewhere, has
filled me with horror and I have frequently condemned it and wished to
make a clean sweep of it. Almost always it seemed to stand for blind
belief and reaction, dogma and bigotry, superstition, exploitation and
the preservation of vested interests.” ― Jawaharlal Nehru
COMMENT | So this
government-employed preacher spews the usual hate speech against the
Chinese community but more importantly, took a swipe at the Johor
royalty and he is arrested for incitement. Incitement against a royal
family or incitement against the Chinese community? Why do I get the
feeling that if it were solely for the latter, there would be no action
taken against Zamihan Mat Zin?
Yes, that is right because no action has been taken against other
government-aligned (including employees) personalities who have made
racists or bigoted comments against non-Muslim Malaysians. Anyone reading my articles would know that I am all for free speech
but free speech isn’t really the issue here and it will never be. The
real issue is the biased manner in which the state monitors free speech.
University lecturer Ridhuan Tee Abdullah who apparently comes to the defence
of his community in this instance has said worse about the Chinese
community. This country gives shelter to an extremist like Zakir Naik
who has spread lies about non-Muslims and their religions. There are
numerous examples of establishment politicians who have demonised entire
communities and they have been exempted from incitement charges.
So when this preacher who thought he was riding a wave of toxicity
and attempted to deliver his own blows against the Chinese community
made his religious pronouncements, the only miscalculation he made was
taking a shot at the royal institution, which is one of the pillars of
Malay/Muslim political ideology.
Hanoi Jane - Bashing Trump As ‘Sexist Bigot’ At Emmys, Jane Fonda’s ‘Nasty Secret’ Just Came Out
Fonda was a Roger Vadim sex slave herself. The plastic on this hypocrite feminist goes beyond her skin and boobs. It goes to the depths of her soul. Hollywood, network news, Hillary and her democrats, and liberal press bunch of putrid cockroaches.
“Clooney helped blacklist me when I spoke up [about] harassment on ER,” claimed ER actress Vanessa Marquez in a post on Twitter. “Women who dont play the game lose career… I did.”
“He’s not who he pretends [to be],” added Marquez in another post.
“Wells, NBC, Amblin, WB, cast & crew & my agents all complicit in my #Blacklist [for] speaking UP in ’95”
After one user expressed their shock that Clooney would be accused of covering up sexual harassment, Marquez replied, “He’s a monster in his own way… Everyone should know The Truth About Clooney.”
France: Facebook Islamists Hunt in Packs by Yves Mamou
Friday, October 13, 2017
The "moderating hubs" for France's social media are generally located in French-speaking countries with cheap labor, in North Africa and Madagascar. In France, rumors abound that Facebook's moderators are located in French-speaking Muslim countries such as Tunisia, Algeria and Morocco. Facebook never confirms or denies outsourcing its "moderation" work to companies employing cheap Muslim labor in North Africa.
Notably, Muslim hate-speakers continue to proliferate on Facebook, while anti-Islamists face harassment and the loss of their accounts.
These Facebook users, like dozens of others, seem to be the victims of Islamist "packs". Once the opinions and analyses of these Facebook users are noticed, they are denounced to Facebook as "racists" or "Islamophobes" and their accounts are deleted.
Fatiha Boudjalat, the co-founder of the secularist movement Viv(r)e la République,
is a prominent figure of anti-Islamism in France. She is interviewed
regularly on television and radio, and her op-eds are regularly
published in Le Figaro. Recently, on Facebook, Boudjalat criticized strongly an Islamist government employee, Sonia Nour, for calling the Tunisian Islamist murderer of two women in Marseille, a "martyr".
A few weeks after that, Boudjalat's Facebook account was deleted. She is not alone in having been targeted by Islamists on Facebook. Leila Ourzik, an artist
who lives in Grigny, a predominantly Muslim suburb not far from Paris,
is a Muslim who eats and drinks openly during Ramadan and resists
wearing the Islamic veil. Because of her un-Islamic behavior, she is
openly insulted and threatened daily, as well as on social networks.
Facebook, Ourzik became a target. Islamists harassed her with insults
and threats, posted her picture on pornography websites, and finally
succeeded in obtaining the deletion of her account on Facebook.
Suddenly, without warning, her Facebook account was shut. "Not once,
many times" she says to Gatestone. Why? "I do not know, they never tell
you. But one day, it is over, everything is deleted".
Pakistan: Senate body rejects ban on child marriage as “un-Islamic”
‘Un-Islamic’: Senate body rejects bill seeking ban on child marriage,” INP, October 10, 2017 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
ISLAMABAD: Senate Standing Committee on Interior and
Narcotics Control in its meeting on Wednesday rejected ‘The Child
Marriage Restraint (Amendment) Bill 2017 moved by Senator Sehar Kamran
and referred the bill to Council of Islamic Ideology (CII) for any
In a committee meeting held at Parliament House, Islamabad, Chairman
Rehman Malik commented on the bill, saying no law shall be approved
contrary to Islamic injunctions. .“We cannot increase the age for
marriage; the age which was allowed in Islam will be followed,” he
Hollywood Actors Who Condemn Trump but Were Silent on Weinstein
BCF : Ashley Judd is the absolute worst.
want to like her, I really do. Sometimes she chooses a good cause, like
speaking up for trafficked and abused children. Those are the
activities she should stick to. Unfortunately, Judd had to go to the
"Women's March," where hundreds of thousands of women wore pink "pussy"
hats while claiming to be upset that Trump had used that word once. She
performed ridiculous slam poetry, screeching defamatory accusations
about the president wanting to have sex with his daughter and about
other terrible things about which she had no first-hand knowledge. (You
can watch the video below if you have the stomach for it.)
But at no time did she ever discuss a man who she did
know did horrific things. No "by the way, Harvey Weinstein is a dirtbag
who tried to get me to watch him shower for a part." Why didn't that
Jennifer Lawrence was recently interviewed for her epic fail of a movie, Mother,
and gave Democratic talking points like "equality for women in the
workplace," blamed Trump for hurricanes, and rattled off the same tired
Leftist arguments we've heard forever. During another interview, she
claimed that she is terrified of Trump and wanted to make a video of
herself saying "F*** you!" to him.
Lawrence claimed she felt she could be a spokesperson for women who are underpaid:
I felt like I had a voice, people look at me and listen to me, and to not say anything, that's never sat well with me.
That seems disingenuous, because she kept quiet about the creepy mogul who everyone in Hollywood appears to have known was abusing women. Why stay quiet over that?
Don't you have a responsibility to alert other women that there is a serial sexual predator in their midst? Lawrence hasn't alleged any harassment from Weinstein, although she is seen looking awkward in many photos with him while he holds her too close to his massive girth. It wouldn't surprise me if she had first-hand knowledge of his depravity.
In not so great britain, the cowards - Extremely Selective Free Speech by Judith Bergman
The issue is not hate preachers visiting the UK from abroad. While banning them from campuses will leave them with fewer venues, it by no means solves the larger issue, which is that they will continue their Dawah or proselytizing elsewhere.
The question probably should be: Based on available evidence, are those assessments of Islam accurate? Particularly compared to current messages that seemingly are considered "conducive to the public good."
At around the same time as the two neo-Nazi groups were banned at the end of September 2017, Home Secretary Amber Rudd refused to ban Hezbollah's political wing in the UK. Hezbollah itself, obviously, does not distinguish between its 'political' and 'military' wings. In other words, you can go ahead and support Hezbollah in the UK, no problem. Support the far right and you can end up in jail for a decade.
Apparently, 112 events featuring extremist speakers took place on UK
campuses in the academic year 2016/2017, according to a recent report
by Britain's Henry Jackson society: "The vast majority of the extreme
speakers recorded in this report are Islamist extremists, though one
speaker has a background in Far-Right politics...." That one speaker was
Tommy Robinson both of whose events were cancelled, one due to hundreds
of students planning to demonstrate to protest his appearance. The
report does not mention student protests at any of the Islamist events.
"Dawah Training... to teach students the fundamentals of
preaching to others... Western foreign policy towards the Islamic world
in general... Grievances...perceived attacks on Muslims and Islam in the
UK... [calling for] scrapping of Prevent and other government
counter-extremism measures [critiquing] arrest and detention of
terrorism suspects... [challenging] ideas such as atheism and
skepticism... religious socio-economic governance, focusing on the role
of religion in fields such as legislation, justice... finance...
religious rulings or interpretations, religious verses or other texts,
important historical or scriptural figures..."
London was the region with the highest number of events, followed by
the South East, according to the report. The most prolific speakers were
affiliated to the Muslim Debate Initiative, the Islamic Education and
Research Academy (iERA), the Muslim Research and Development Foundation
(MRDF), the Hittin Institute, Sabeel, and CAGE. Most speakers were
invited by Islamic student societies, and a high proportion of the talks
took place during campus events such as "Discover Islam Week", "Islam
Awareness Week" and "Islamophobia Awareness Month".
Videos from an Italian politician who died somewhat mysteriously on June 5, 2016, both on EU
Thursday, October 12, 2017
This mans is absolutely outstanding !! A truth teller to the people"They" assassinated him with a 'car accident.'That car accident where he died must be investigated again. He said a lot of thing that was obvious only now to the masses. There was an attempt of Farage's life too, this wouldn't be the only case. Regardless, streets should be named after this guy when the traitor EU elite will be defeated finally. Great and brave man!
Palestinian Normalization -- With Hamas, Not Israel by Bassam Tawil
The most widespread conspiracy theory, which has been floating around for decades and can be heard in almost every coffee shop on the streets of Cairo, Amman, Ramallah and Beirut, is that Zionist Jews, together with American capitalists and imperialists, have a secret plan to take control over the Arab and Islamic countries and their resources.
How exactly are the "Zionists and imperialists" trying to "undermine" the Palestinian "national project"? And what, precisely, is this project? Is it the project of Hamas and many other Palestinians that seeks the destruction of Israel?
The corrupt Arab and Palestinian leaders spread such rumors to divert attention from problems at home, such as corruption and dictatorship.
These leaders want their people too busy hating Jews and Westerners to demand reform, democracy and transparency from their leaders. Those valuables, of course, are what Arab and Palestinian leaders still refuse to offer their people.
Why do many Palestinians prefer peace with Hamas? Because they identify with Hamas's dream of destroying Israel and killing Jews. It may be an unpleasant a truth, but that is the bottom line.
The question is, did they know what Weinstein was up to? Clooney insists, “I had no idea that it had gone to the level of having to pay off eight women for their silence, and that these women were threatened and victimized.” The comment seems to be limited to “these women” — the eight who were paid off.
Like a politician, Clooney is answering a question nobody asked. Did he know Weinstein was inviting actresses to business meetings that turned into bedroom meetings that turned into sexual overtures with career implications? Weinstein has been, for more than two decades, one of the most-talked-about figures in Hollywood. Could news of such revolting acts really never have reached Clooney’s ears? It seems more likely that Clooney was part of a conspiracy of silence. Movie Clooney is very interested in exposing the pernicious actions of oil companies (Syriana), chemical companies (Michael Clayton), TV hucksters (Money Monster), McCarthyism (Good Night, and Good Luck), and the masterminds of the first Gulf War (Three Kings).
Real-life Clooney plugs his ears when people in Hollywood gossip about a subject that has evidently been a hot topic of conversation since Pauly Shore was considered a movie star. Weinstein’s habits were such an open secret they were joked about on 30 Rock and the Oscar telecast. As for Streep, she no doubt believed she was speaking truth to power when, upon receipt of a career honor at the Golden Globes ceremony this year, she spent her entire speech heaving broadsides at President Trump.
Does Trump constitute power in her world, though? It isn’t like Trump can do much of anything in response except send a couple of grumpy tweets. Power, to Streep, is someone like Weinstein, someone who could cast her or not cast her, possibly even influence the hiring decisions of others. And Weinstein’s skill in campaigning for Oscars is unparalleled. He was widely credited for winning her a third Oscar for The Iron Lady, notably by Streep herself, who said in her acceptance speech, “I want to thank God — Harvey Weinstein.” Or are we to believe that Streep is the only actress on earth who didn’t know what Weinstein was up to? The New Yorker story this week contains this line about Lucia Stoller (now Evans), an actress who says Weinstein forced her to give him oral sex.
Obama is an Abomination, Obscenity and a Communist
Wednesday, October 11, 2017
Alan Keyes was a featured speaker at a fundraiser for the Triple A Crisis Pregnancy Center in Hastings, Nebraska, on February 19, 2009, where a reporter from KHAS-TV interviewed him about his thoughts on Obama.
With conviction, Alan firmly stated that Obama is a radical communist (which he is) and a usurper (which he has done since he hasn't produced an original birth certificate). And that Obama supports infanticide--the killing of babies born alive after botched abortions.
The story was later picked up by Keith Olberman of MSNBC who spent time on the show calling Alan Keyes names in order to diminish the importance of what Alan said. Alan must have hit a nerve. Go Alan!
They are traitors who were put into power to do exactly what they did, but the pit they dug for the American people to fall into they have fallen into themselves. Push forward, men of valor, and we will bury the bastards.