The school fears that it would not be able to uphold its rules reflecting traditional Christian teaching on marriage and sexuality. Additionally, the school says that the state requires licensed facilities to allow students to have the right to engage in spiritual and sexual exploration.

Additionally, the law does not allow for religious exemptions in cases where a religious school would be forced to violate its moral convictions. “We have been kind of harassed by the state of California Department of Social Services. Specifically, it's called Community Care Licensing,” RVCA CEO Phil Ludwig told The Christian Post, arguing that state investigators seem to have a political “agenda.”

River View Christian Academy (RVCA), which helps troubled teens from across the U.S., has faced pressure from the Department of Social Services for over a decade over claims that it operates as an “unlicensed community care facility.” A law passed in 2016 requires many alternative boarding schools in the state to attain Community Care Licensing.

"Vote for me - I'm a Muslim" , exactly what Khan said I remember. I am sick of these sneaky underhand invaders encroaching into our society. Why the hell would we want a Muslim PM when the ideology he follows is totally incompatible with our culture, and is already being rammed down our throats.

Or did they dredge up some never before used, arcane law that they applied to this case. Do they also jail muslims who take share or otherwise glorify any of the thousands of jihad videos available online all over the place?

Our Great Leader

"I have some Muslim friends, very good friends. They are not like the other Muslims, that’s why they are my friends..."

Imagine some non-Muslim politician saying that. We Muslims would find it quite disrespectful.

So, Malaysian PM Mahathir is similarly disrespectful here: https://t.co/czG0huWEzB

— Mustafa Akyol (@AkyolinEnglish) June 17, 2019

We must be reminded that he is always the PM of Malaya for treating Sabah and Sarawak like pieces of old rags despite plundering their oil richess for developing Malaya. His discrimination against them are all written in the lopsided development recorded. He's old and demented...a tragedy for our nation...

Mahathir has received flak from numerous quarters after telling the Cambridge Union on Sunday that the Jews he knows are only his friends because they are unlike others from the community. "Imagine some non-Muslim politician saying that. We Muslims would find it quite disrespectful.

So when is she going to be jailed ??? When the dems start lawyering up... THEN I’ll get excited. Listen to the jargon that is constantly used regarding Hillary. They soften everything - like "mishandled". This is total BS! We're talking about straight-up TREASON! Life in prison would be a tame consequence indeed for treason, which is a capital offense under the law!

Muslim Rape Gang

It is easy to see why: British authorities are paralyzed by the fear of being seen as “racist” and “Islamophobic.” And that fear could be Britain’s epitaph. “Rochdale grooming gang members ‘still not deported’ 10 years after attacks,” by Kate Buck, Metro, June 16, 2019 (thanks to The Religion of Peace) :

Know these 4 Arabic Words : Taqqiya, Tawariya, Kitman and Muruna, their meaning!!

Yes, he said, it was as predicted: “Earnest, ostentatiously sincere ask-us-anything faces. Thirty or so unwary Infidels. The main speaker began by telling us that Islam means ‘peace’, then quoted the Pope  who had said that  ‘Authentic Islam and the proper reading of the Koran are opposed to every form of violence'”. Qur’an 5:32 was presented in its abridged form: “If any one slew a person… it would be as if he slew a whole people; and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of a whole people”.

Then again they will not mention the chapter and verse immediately after the former 5:33 which says : The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter.

Someone in the audience asked about the Jizyah and the speaker took it in stride. He said, not missing a beat, that the Jizyah was what non-Muslims paid to the state, instead of the Zakat that Muslims had to pay.  Since non-Muslims were receiving protection (from whom was not spelled out) and did not have to serve in the army, it was only just that they be asked to pay their fair share — hence the  Jizyah. In fact, he added, the Zakat was actually more burdensome than the Jizyah. No one sought to take issue with the speaker; the audience seemed satisfied with that preposterous claim.

In K. S. Lal, “The Theory and Practice of the Muslim State In India”, Delhi,1999, on pp. 139-140, the author makes plain the difference between Zakat and Jizyah:

“There is a desire to equate Zakat with Jizyah to emphasize the fairness of the Islamic fiscal system. The Muslims pay Zakat and the non-Muslims Jizyah. But the analogy is fallacious. The rate of Zakat tax is as low as 2.5 per cent and that on the apparent [visible] property only. All kinds of concessions for payment of the Zakat exist with regard to the taxable minimum. In its collection no force is applied because force vitiates its character.

“On the other hand, the rate of Jizyah is very high for the non-Muslims: 48, 24, and 12 tankahs [one of the main historical currencies in Asia] for the rich, the middling, and the poor, whatever the currency and whichever the country. Besides, what is central to Jizyah is always the humiliation of the Infidel, particularly at the time of collection. What is central in Zakat is that it is voluntary; at least it should not be collected by force. In India Zakat ceased to be a religious tax imposed only on the Muslims.  

Zakat was levied in the shape of customs duties on merchandise and grazing fees on all milk-producing animals or those which went to pasture, and was realized both from Muslims and non-Muslims. According to Muslim law, ‘import duties for Muslims were 5 per cent and for non-Muslims 10 per  cent of the community.  Abu Hanifa, whose  Sunni school of jurisprudence prevailed in India, would tax the merchandise of the Dhimmis as imposts at double the Zakat fixed for Muslims.

Jizyah was calculated so as to inflict real financial pain on Infidels, and had to be paid no matter how poor they might be. This was part of their punishment for being Infidels, to pay for their own protection (protection from Muslims themselves). Zakat, on the other hand, was never meant to be a financial burden on Muslims. Normally it would be only 2.5% of a Muslim’s wealth, and imposed only if he possessed a certain minimum wealth, or nisab.

An important part of the Jizyah payment, which is never mentioned by Muslim apologists (and certainly not at any Open-Mosque event) was the deliberate humiliation, while making the payment, of the dhimmi. The Jizyah was not, as most Infidels would understandably assume, simply handed over to Muslim collectors. There had to be humiliation. Surah 9:29 states that the people of the book (Christians and Jews) are to pay the Jizyah in a state where they are saaghiruun. This word, according to the Arabic experts, means “humiliation or disgrace.” (See Tafsir Al-Tabari, Volume 12, page 96; Al-Qaradihi, Kitab Al-‘Ayn Lil-Khaleel, Volume 4, page 372).

Slaughtering Christians in Muslim majority Burkina Faso without repercussions

Dozens of armed unidentified gunmen killed at least 19 and injured 13 others in northern Burkina Faso on Sunday. A local government official told AFP on the condition of anonymity that the attack occurred between 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. and that 19 bodies were found at the time. The official said a search was underway to find others who were killed.

Hours before the gunmen attacked, the source said the gunmen stopped three vehicles in the town of Arbinda and set them on fire. The official detailed that one of the drivers was killed. The killing in Arbinda comes as armed groups have spread across the Shael region and committed atrocities in Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso. The United Nations reports that the violence has led to the displacement of at least 4.2 million people, 1 million more than in 2018.

In Burkina Faso, innocent lives are being lost due to the rise of jihadist attacks and government counterterror operations. In April, more than 60 people were killed in an attack in Arbinda which has been hit hard by violence. “There is no Christian anymore in this town [Arbinda],” an anonymous contact told the Christian aid charity Barnabus Fund. “It’s proven that they were looking for Christians. Families who hide Christians are killed. Arbinda had now lost a total of no less than 100 people within six months.”

Since 2016, armed Islamist groups linked to both al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb and the Islamic State in Greater Sahara have been attacking civilian targets, police stations and military posts in Burkina Faso, according to Human Rights Watch. Although the violence has spread throughout the country, the “epicenter” of the violence sits in the northern Sahel, a region that borders Mali and Niger.

Heartbreaking and sick, this has to be stopped and now. The whole british Police and political system is rotten to the core now and Tommy Robinson is so right!!! This is hard to listen too, it's also hard believe this stuff is going on today, and Labour as been covering this stuff up .The police are using the term 'racist' as an excuse NOT to act.

I don't know anything about this case but it sounds like this Pakistani family is being protected. That level of protection can only come from very high ranking officer[s]. The average Bobby on the street just follows due process UNLESS he/she is told by a senior officer to act otherwise. Get a solicitor and take action against the police officers involved in the case.

🆘‼😯🕌 #India: #Muslim man in Jalpaiguri marries his own daughter! Is there still any other abnormal increases? by blocked @OnlineMagazin pic.twitter.com/EVV54OevP3

— The Backup of OnlineMagazin (@Fake_Ljaschko) June 16, 2019

Mahmoud Shalash

Shalash’s mosque, the Islamic Center of Lexington, had contacted Lexington cops and Homeland Security, while claiming to be suffering from Islamophobic threats.
Before long, two cop cars in the Kentucky city known as the Horse Capital of the World were parked outside the mosque to protect the imam and his congregation. The FBI also got on board.

CAIR widely circulated reports of the threat to what it called, a “house of worship”.
“Our nation’s leaders must send a clear message challenging the rising Islamophobia that leads to such threats,” CAIR’s Ibrahim Hooper declared. With the 2016 election still imminent, his news release blamed the “extreme anti-Muslim rhetoric” of Donald Trump and Ben Carson. Four years later, Imam Mahmoud Shalash is in jail. The imam of the Islamic Center, along with John Sadiqullah, and Abdul Hadi, were charged in a harmful and not especially peaceful murder plot.

What makes this particular murder plot interesting is that it would have been authorized with a fatwa. Imam Shalash has worn many hats. According to a LinkedIn profile, In addition to running the Islamic Center of Lexington, a man of that name owned a mobile home park and the Bluegrass Extended Stay motel (guest reviews have complained about roaches, stained beds and unfriendliness to service dogs), was a member of the Muslim Students Association (a terror linked Muslim Brotherhood hate group) while working on a degree in electrical engineering at the University of Chicago, and, ironically, considering his current predicament, had worked as a chaplain at “fedral and state prisons”.

Churning out low class graduates who qualified by the race and religious factor

COMMENT | On a working visit to England, prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad said: “Whose hands would we leave the fate of this nation to, if not to the young generation? Let us work together and unite to create a bright future for Malaysia.” Politicians like to claim that “young people” are the future of this country. What they really mean is that young people are potential voters to keep the system in place. Meanwhile, a young Malaysian wrote a letter to the media about the harsh reality of education in Malaysia that exemplifies all that is wrong with the system. What I liked about it was that it was devoid of polemics.

A Chess Master

He has repeatedly said that what happened to him should never happen to another President. But there’s more and the left still doesn’t get it and I need to spell it out even more clearly. Trump has baited the left into making all kinds of caustic remarks and they have swallowed the lure.

Analysis of this Trump clip consumed most of the hour with O’Donnell interviewing several guests, including MSNBC contributor Jennifer Rubin, who went on an angry tirade against the President: “You have to ask a more fundamental question which is, how can anyone in their right mind and good conscience support putting this guy in office for another four years…”

Another ‘fundamental question’: how does MSNBC retain viewership when it insults over half the U.S. population who voted for Trump? Rubin continued: “He is a mess. He has betrayed his country. He will do it again. If he’s reelected can you imagine what he’s going to do, then? It’s really catastrophic.” The only one Trump has been betraying is the liberal media that he has rightfully labeled “fake news”.

Here’s what the DNC media spent its time on yesterday. Remember all these words. They’re going to be used again and all of the above may be called as witnesses. Against Hillary Clinton and the DNC. Their hatred of Trump has made them clueless and careless and Trump was counting on that. They did not let him (or me) down.
Here is the key point:

• It is illegal for anyone to solicit, accept, or receive anything of value from a foreign national in connection with a U.S. election

Christopher Steele is a foreign national. He solicited and obtained Russian disinformation which was then paid for by Hillary Clinton and the DNC and spread throughout the government because obama changed the rules. The Steele dossier was very valuable to democrats in the 2016 election and then even afterward.

Donald Trump was not talking about himself. He was talking about Obama, Clinton and the DNC. He let the left make an iron clad case for charging Clinton and the DNC with felonies. Remember, Obama’s OFA paid Fusion GPS nearly a million dollars beginning in April 2016, shortly after Josef Mifsud began poisoning the well. And while we’re at it, Adam Schiff may be similarly charged. He solicited nude pictures of Donald Trump and never told the FBI about it. No word on whether he still wants them.

Felony. Treasonous. Not on America’s team. Dead wrong.

There’s a lot for Barr and Durham to unpack here but Trump has set the left up like bowling pins. All Barr and Durham need do now is knock them down.
Congratulations, dems!

His comments came after five violent attacks in London in less than 24 hours left three men dead and three injured. Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said it was "absolutely awful" Mr Trump was using the "tragedy of people being murdered to attack the mayor". Police have increased patrols in the capital following the attacks. President Trump's tweets follow a long-running feud with Khan.

Evil Ninjas in NOT so great britain

If Mohammed Amin really believes that people like Boris Johnson who make fun of the niqab are unfit to hold high public office, then it isn’t Boris who’s the extremist – it’s him. Amin, chairman of the Muslim Conservative Forum, has caused a stink by saying on this morning’s Today programme that he would leave the Tory party if Johnson becomes PM.

He thinks Johnson lacks the ‘basic level of morality and integrity’ to hold such a position, partly because he once ‘chose to mock Muslim women who wear [the] niqab and burqa’. Amin doesn’t understand morality. What would be truly immoral in a free country would be to deny people high office on the basis that they have ‘blasphemed’ against Islamic practices.

Amin was referring to the now infamous Daily Telegraph column in which Johnson said the niqab and burqa make women look like letterboxes and bank robbers. This is frequently held up by Corbynistas and commentators as proof of Johnson’s ‘Islamophobia’, which only confirms that the term ‘Islamophobia’ is now explicitly used to police not only abuse or discrimination against Muslims, which everyone agrees are terrible things, but also mere criticism of Islamic practices.

Sadiq Kunt

Khan has not always been accurate in his charges. Just before Trump’s first state visit to the U.K., Sadiq Khan published in The Observer on June 2 an article in which he described Trump as “one of the most egregious examples of a growing global threat.” He added that Trump’s “divisive behavior flies in the face of the ideals America was founded upon — equality, liberty and religious freedom.”

How does Trump’s ‘“divisive behavior” fly in the face of these ideas? When has Trump threatened either “equally” or “liberty” in America? We know that Sadiq Khan is thinking of Muslims in the U.S., and perhaps believes the CAIR-promoted tales of victimhood, but Trump, who is rightly worried about Muslim terrorism, has not in any way restricted the “religious freedom” of Muslims.

Perhaps Sadiq Khan would care to supply us with a single example of how his behavior “flies in the face of religious freedom”? Did Trump shut down a single mosque, censor a single verse in the Qur’an, prevent the observance of Ramadan or of Friday Prayers? He hasn’t done a single thing, not one jot or tittle, to restrict Muslims in the free exercise of their religion. Sadiq Khan should know this. But in his haste to score points against Trump, he did not bother to inform himself properly. He deplored the so-called “Muslim ban” thus:

“I think this ban on people from seven Muslim-majority countries” is cruel and shameful. Khan had simply assumed they were all Muslim-majority countries, when two of the seven, Venezuela and North Korea, were non-Muslim. One minute of Internet searching was all he needed to discover the truth.

Hayleab and Tesfit Brhane, 19 and 20, picked their victim up on the city’s streets after she had been drinking wine and smoking cannabis. They then subjected her to a sustained sexual assault at Hayleab's home in Downs Road. The pair – who are from Eritrea - argued she agreed to intercourse and made up the rape allegations because she felt ashamed.

But today a jury rejected their story and convicted Tesfit of two counts of rape and Hayleab of one count. Both men stared straight ahead emotionless, not looking at the jury, as the verdict was passed.

Judge Catherine Brown told the men: “Tesfit you have been convicted of two counts of rape. Hayleab you have been convicted of one count of rape. “Before I determine the appropriate sentence I need to know more about each of you. You have not grown up in the UK and I need to know about your backgrounds.

Donald J Trump

According to the polls, President Trump starts at a disadvantage. He has 44 percent approval in the Real Clear Politics average, with a net disapproval of 9 points. The most recent Quinnipiac poll has the major Democrats defeating Trump.

The margins range from Joe Biden’s 13-point victory to Pete Buttigieg and Cory Booker’s 5-points. Another recent Quinnipiac poll has Biden leading Trump by four points in Texas. Private surveys of the Lone Star State also show a tight race.

Trump polls very badly among suburban women, and the growth in suburban Texas has been extraordinary. Which spells trouble.

Azmin Ali

COMMENT | The only thing of importance in this sex video scandal is that, is the video genuine or, as some claim, a fake? I do not care what two consenting adults do in the privacy of the bedroom but I do care if they belong to a class of people who routinely demonise marginalised groups using religion. But this is also another point in a litany of moral and intellectual corruption in mainstream Malay politics.

The Dems clearly launched a coup and failed. In ancient times, their heads would be chopped off. They need to be brought to Justice! Hillary and Obama didn’t call the FBI because she ordered the FBI to to do the job. The lefts hipocracy knows no bounds. And their Lies are pathetic at best!!! They will go down!This channel should be playing in airports instead of CNN. Never vote democrat ever again traitors to America.

However, this is coming from the same group of people who had no problems using foreign oppo research paid for by the Clinton campaign to impeach Trump. Also, the latest Feminist Fight: Renaming blockbuster franchises to remove “men” from the title.

Looks like our fantastic President Donald Trump is draining the Park Swamps too. How much did those signs cost the American Taxpayers. The money they use so freely!!!!!

The Dumfuk Playboy PM of Pakistan aka Terroristan

No one ever blamed Hinduism for Tamil Tigers’ bombings or Japanese religion when they blew up themselves on US ships. So why Islam is branded so?” Khan said during the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) summit in Makkah. He asserted that “the Muslim world has not been able to powerfully convince the world that Islam has nothing to do with terrorism,” adding that the OIC should clarify its ‘propaganda’ about Muslims.

This was duly reported around the world, without his charges being subject to critical examination. But Imran Khan had a number of things wrong — aside, of course, from his absurd claim the “Islam has nothing to do with terrorism.” First, he wondered why Hinduism was not blamed for the terrorist attacks of the Tamil Tigers. But the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka, known as the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), were not inspired by Hinduism; no Hindu texts were relied on by them to justify their attacks; some of the Tamil Tigers were not even Hindus.

Compare the Tamil Tigers to Muslim terrorists, who are acting according to the Qur’anic verses that command them to wage violent Jihad against all Unbelievers, and to “strike terror” in their hearts. The goal of jihad is ultimately to conquer the world for the faith, so that Islam everywhere dominates, and Muslims rule, everywhere. The LTTE, by contrast, was a self-styled national liberation organization, with the primary goal of establishing an independent Tamil state in northern Sri Lanka. It had nothing to do with spreading Hinduism; Tamil nationalism was the basis of its ideology.

The LTTE denied being a separatist movement based on religion — non-Hindu Tamils were members, while non-Tamil Hindus were not. It t saw itself as fighting for self-determination and the restoration of Tamil sovereignty in part of Sri Lanka. The LTTE was an avowedly secular organization; religion did not play any discernible part in its ideology. In fact, the LTTE Leader Velupillai Prabhakaran was a secularist who criticized what he saw as the oppressive features of traditional Hindu Tamil society, such as the caste system and gender inequality.

And that is why no one blamed Hinduism for the terrorism of the Tamil Tigers. It’s doubtful that Imran Khan knew any of this; he is known not for his intellect, but for his skills as a cricket player and playboy before he entered politics, and apparently he did not feel the need to learn more about the Tamil Tigers and their nationalist and secular agenda, before presuming to pontificate about them. It may be worth noting that Khan’s knowledge of geography has also put to the test, and found wanting:

This is a pre-screening of Katie Hopkins documentary, telling us about what is happening in Europe that has changed and the impacts to people who are questioning... Is it SAFE to stay? "They don't recognize their own country!"

ISIS

The Islamic State, despite losing territory in Syria and Iraq, has long called for attacks on Western nations globally. General Joseph Votel–head of the US military’s Central Command–also stated months ago “that it was necessary to maintain a vigilant offensive against the now largely dispersed and disaggregated [IS] that retains leaders, fighters, facilitators, resources and the profane ideology that fuels their efforts”. The “profane ideology” to “Kill them wherever you find them” (Qur’an 2:191, 4:89) has infiltrated all Western countries, while Leftists fall for the “Islamophobia” trap.

Yesterday, Jihad Watch reported that a “major Taliban sanctuary and weapons storage area” was found in a mosque. While Western authorities largely fail to recognize what the obvious jihadist threat is about, using a mosque–a place of worship–is highly significant in further demonstrating the clear religious motive in the global jihad. “Afghan armed forces carefully conducted the operation to bust the sanctuary of the group considering the sacred place of mosque.” “Experts: Islamic State Reshaping the Jihadi Landscape of Afghanistan”, by John Hayward, Breitbart, June 10, 2019:

The word Kafir is inducing many Muslims to, not integrate themselves with other non-Muslims.

The word Kafir and justification for punishment for kafirs have been used extensively by various Islamic rulers against non-Muslims during last 1300 or so years of Islamic history. Non-Muslims were levied taxes known as Jizya to force them into submission to Islam, also indescribable violence towards Kafirs and many times justification of violence against non-Muslims or Kafirs were carried out by Islamic invaders.

The word Jizya comes from Persia when Arabic Islam invaded the Sassanid empire. Arabic Muslim invaders adopted the Sassanid system of taxes and levied a special tax on those who didn’t accept their rule. The people on whom this tax was levied were called dhimmi. The word Kafir thus holds to be the most racist and derogatory term ever used in the history of the world. Islam makes a very strong distinction between Muslims and non-Muslims. The distinction often creates islands of Muslim communities wherever Islam is practiced.

Ultimately the goal of Islamic rulers is to make everyone subservient to Islam. The six principal articles of faith as per Islam are God, His messengers, angels, revealed books, day of resurrection (Kayamat) and destiny. Anyone who doesn’t believe in them or has an alternate system of beliefs is called kafir.

Mujid with Zakar Naik

COMMENT | There is all this venom against alleged money launderer and fugitive Zakir Naik online. Truth be told that I have contributed to the venom and am distressed that this time, I cannot summon enough outrage to write a piece about how damaging Zakir is to this country. It is the same with Jho Low. People despise him, but if you have hung around the corridors of power in Putrajaya, people like Jho Low are a dime a dozen. Both Zakir Naik and Jho Low, the fugitive and alleged accomplice of Najib and Co, have a couple of things in common.

Read the review here

On May 28, CAIR’s PA leadership—namely Jacob Bender, Timothy Welbeck, Ahmet Selim Tekelioglu —sent a letter to USAWC Commandant Gen. John Kem and Provost Dr. James Breckenridge urging them to revoke “the decision of the US Army War College to invite Mr. Raymond Ibrahim to deliver the prestigious 50^th Annual Lecture Series of the US Army War College.”

The reason CAIR cites to disinvite me is that “Raymond Ibrahim’s book …  advance[s] a simplistic, inaccurate and often prejudicial view of the long history of Muslim-West relations which we find deeply troubling.” Much of this is covered in a Task Force report, which contains some responses from me, titled, “Army War College under fire over historian’s upcoming lecture on ‘clash of civilizations’ between Islam and the West.”

As a reflection of the unprecedented (and ongoing) nature of this Islamist campaign against me, the Task Force notes that, “The trend of disinviting speakers on controversial subjects has been on the rise at American universities in recent years, but this appears to be the first time that a speaker at U.S. military educational institution has been subject to such a campaign, according to a database maintained by the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (emphasis added).”

CAIR has since issued other screeds, including a Press Release and a petition that present me as a “notoriousIslamophobe,” and—despite my being of Egyptian descent—a “white nationalist,” who, if allowed to speak, will cause “white nationalism, Islamophobia, and violence” against Muslims in America to break out.

Is that a beard or a heavy shadow?

From what articles have come into our mailbox today, it seems that some invisible man, had a bag of weapons and explosives, and instead of using them, screamed about them til he was shot to death by Swedish police.

Read it all here..............

For years, those who spoke of this issue were demonized as the ones who had the problem. Now that this issue is here, what solution do the progressives have? BBC on the clash between fundamentalist Muslims (who have immense reach & power) & LGBT community: https://t.co/uOutUtYX7m pic.twitter.com/F26Or3MkLm

— Andy Ngo (@MrAndyNgo) June 10, 2019