COMMENT | Should Penang Chief
Minister Lim Guan Eng debate Minister in the Prime Minister's Department
Wee Ka Siong or any other Chinese political operative from BN? Why yes,
he should. I do not know about anyone else but the back and forth on the Penang
undersea tunnel has not done any favours for either side - if one is
looking at it rationally, that is - and if anything, MCA-DAP debates
usually dissolve into slagging matches between the two parties as to who
has the Chinese community's interest at heart, which is always fun to
That’s it, isn’t it? Political racial theatre that keeps us
entertained while real policies that the progressives claim to want,
disappear beneath a cloud of smoke of the spectacle of Chinese
leadership slugging it out. The MCA knows what it is and this does not
mean running dogs for the establishment (it’s more complicated than
that), while the DAP has to keep a schizoid perspective depending on
what type of kool-aid they are dispensing.
Non-Malay political parties have this delusion that they are
independent operators. They are not. They are in reality proxies for
Malay power structures, with varying degrees of public and private
influence within Malay hegemons. To believe otherwise, would be
delusional. While it is easy to paint the MCA as running dogs of Umno,
the same could be said of the DAP, who have had to bend over backwards
to accommodate the return of Dr Mahathir Mohamad into the opposition
Official narratives of the state through their racial and religious
bureaus paint the community as avaricious, opportunists waiting to usurp
Malay power and distort Malay culture. Religious preachers talk of how
“rude” the Chinese community is and point to internecine conflicts which
either reinforces the stereotype that the community cannibalises itself
for Malay power or points to the uncouth and insolent behaviour of the
community when it comes to politics.
The opposition and the MCA are merely furthering anti-Chinese
narratives in their quest to sustain ownership of the votes of their
community. Anti-Chinese narratives include the DAP colluding with Malay
oppositional personalities that claim China is attempting to subvert
Malay power. Anti-Chinese narratives are fostered by the so-called war
with the MCA.
This is what is problematic in the war between the MCA and DAP. This
idea that minorities have to tear each other apart in service of Malay
power structures. If the fight between the MCA and DAP was solely based
on policy or whatever corruption scandal du jour, it would not
be a bad thing. Competition in the marketplace of ideas and propaganda
is good thing. However, both always brings it back to whose voice is
more important because they have the vote of the Chinese community.
I like DAP supremo Lim Kit Siang but suggesting that Mahathir lead
the royal commission of inquiry (RCI) on the 1MDB fiasco with a coterie
of Pakatan Harapan operatives (making half of the commissioners) is the
dumbest thing I have heard so far in this election cycle. Why would
anyone say such a thing? Honestly, it is a statement that the DAP would
claim that is something only the MCA would make.
When it comes to racial politics, minorities squabbling for the
political interests of majoritarian stakeholders is painful to watch.
Malays from either side of the political divide at least sometimes can
meet halfway on those politically-designed issues of race and religion.
Throw in culture and you have Malay power structures at war, but not
tearing each other’s eyes out like how the non-Malay component parties
do in the service of gaining political power for their Malay overlords.