Canada Moves to Ban Christians From Demonstrating in Public Under New “Anti-Hate” Proposal
Friday, May 24, 2019
Jihad Watch : Dark times in Canada. “Anti-hate” – who decides what’s good and
what’s forbidden? Terror tied groups like CAIR? Antifa? Freedom of
speech is the foundation of a free society. Without it, a tyrant can
wreak havoc unopposed, while his opponents are silenced.
Putting up with being offended is essential in a pluralistic society
in which people differ on basic truths. If a group will not bear being
offended without resorting to violence, that group will rule unopposed
while everyone else lives in fear, while other groups curtail their
activities to appease the violent group. This results in the violent
group being able to tyrannize the others.
Islamic law forbids criticism of Islam, Quran, Muhammad. If they
cannot be criticized, we are in effect accepting Islamic law as
overriding the freedom of speech. This would establish Muslims as a
protected class and prevent honest discussion of how Islamic jihadists
use the texts and teachings of Islam to justify violence and
supremacism. The concept of Islamophobia has two meanings. Few ever make any
distinction between them. One is the brutalization of innocent Muslims,
which is never justified. The problem is that the label is also used to
refer to analysis of how Islamic texts and teachings incite to violence.
Any criticism of jihad terror that examines its ideological roots in
Islam is called Islamophobia, The word is used to intimidate people into
thinking there is something wrong with opposing jihad terror. This
deforms our response to terrorism by placing off-limits any examination
of its guiding ideology, and effectively enforces Sharia blasphemy laws
in the US by placing Islam, Quran, Muhammad beyond criticism. If speech that offends a group is outlawed, that group has absolute
power, and a free society is destroyed. A group that cannot be
criticized cannot be opposed. It can work its will no matter what it is,
and no one will be able to say anything to stop it.
Inoffensive speech needs no protection. The First Amendment was
developed precisely in order to protect speech that was offensive to
some, in order to prevent those who had power from claiming they were
offended by speech opposing them and silencing the powerless.
A free society is by its nature one in which people put up with
others being uncivil and offensive. The alternative is a quiet
authoritarian society in which only one opinion is allowed and the
others are silenced, and ultimately sent to the camps. The quran is full of hatred and violence. Will Trudeau ban the quran?
The Canadian province of Ontario is considering legislation that would officially criminalize Christianity.
Big League Politics, May 20, 2019:
Legislation proposed in the Canadian province of Ontario would
criminalize public displays by Christians deemed hateful to Muslims, the
LGBT community and other victim groups designated by the left.