Professor Jordan Peterson declares “Islam is not compatible with democracy” amid Canada’s battle for free speech
Thursday, June 06, 2019
Jihad Watch : Hungarian leader Viktor Orban and Canada’s Dr. Jordan Peterson met
last week and “slammed Illegal Immigration as well as the ideological
premise of ‘political correctness which in their view “make sensible
public discussions virtually impossible”.
Peterson also said that Islam is not compatible with democracy and
the issue is not “allowed to be discussed”, a message which has been
repeatedly expressed by Jihad Watch. Professor Jordan Peterson soared to popularity given his views in
support of intellectual freedoms, free speech and human rights. His
latest defense of free speech couldn’t have come at a better time. News emerged
in Canada this week that opposition Conservative leader Andrew Scheer
threw Tory MP Michael Cooper out of a House of Commons “Justice and
Human Rights” committee hearing — examining online hate — after Cooper’s
confrontation with a Muslim witness. Jihad Watch covered the story HERE.
The Justin Trudeau government continues its campaign–heavily advised
by the National Council of Canadian Muslims (formerly CAIR-CAN)– to
“crack down” on free speech in efforts to battle “Islamophobia“, which includes an expensive followup to anti-Islamophobia motion M-103. This Justice and Human Rights Commons committee hearing is an extension of M-103 by all indicators.
Meanwhile, outside of Government efforts remains (for now) the freedom of the people. In a statement highlighting the nonsensical “Islamophobia”
subterfuge, Peterson “recently faced criticism for posing in a picture
with a man wearing a T-shirt with the text ‘I’m a proud Islamophobe’, an
incident that cost him a fellowship at Cambridge University.”
“Islamophobia” is a term which has no place in any democracy. It is propelled by Organization of Islamic Cooperation initiatives to subvert democracies. Those who force the “Islamophobia” agenda are adamant that the word not be replaced with “anti-Muslim bigotry“,
the latter of which would put Muslims on equal ground as any other
faith or group. Islamic supremacists seek special treatment and they do
it by wielding an invented victimology narrative, all the while covering
up the gross abuses committed in the name of Islam globally.
The term “islamophobia” was defined by the National Council of Canadian Muslims as “fear, prejudice, hatred or dislike directed against Islam or Muslims, or towards Islamic politics or culture.” I was subsequently fired by the Liberal government
from my position as a director with the Canadian Race Relations
Foundation (CRRF); a subject that was raised again during this current
House of Commons committee hearing on “Justice and Human Rights“. It was raised by ‘witness’, Jasmin Zine, who has “a long record of “Islamophobia” propagandizing”, as Robert Spencer wrote HERE.
It is worthwhile to note that the CRRF operates from the Department of
Heritage, that same department under which M-103 emerged.