BREAKING: Terrorist firebombing attack on Jewish preschool in Sydney. The terrorists spray painted “FUCK THE JEWS” next to the burning building.

I thought they just wanted a ceasefire???

We need mass arrests and deportations for Islamist extremists inciting the violence pic.twitter.com/PeUQjNPQ1M

— Drew Pavlou (@DrewPavlou) January 21, 2025

AFTER the ceasefire went into effect. As awful a thing as this is, it is yet another of the hundred thousand tells that Islam has an agenda, and like the left, it is never what they tell you it is overtly, but always what they tell each other it is. They want to kill all the Jews. Any analysis from Muslims based on geopolitical considerations is for the most part a lie.

Geopolitics and nation-states is the epitome of the West and Western approaches to organizing societies, especially post WW2. Muslims and the sophisticated left do not think like that. We do not understand how they think. They do understand how we think. As a result, they are able to circumnavigate us all the time.

Muslims made a deal with the people of Mecca when he attacked them and they won. They agreed to a ceasefire for 10 years. After 2 years, it was clear the Meccans had relaxed their guard and they attacked the city and took it. Their agreements mean nothing. Only their objectives. Recognize this or perish. And I mean perish.

Look for remains of pre-Islamic societies in any Muslim country. If archeologists find an ancient Church in Saudi Arabia, the state has it destroyed. Islam, like the Left, memory holes any trace of a pre-Islamic or pre-communist world. Get this. Understand this. It’s no joke.

Satan's Spawn

These have been widely denounced as deflection, and there is indeed something about the Rudakubana story that feels off. In particular, Keir Starmer’s insistence on the suspect’s lone-wolf status and pivot to “knife control” is driving a proliferation of conspiratorial thinking. But is there really a sinister cover-up?

Watching the pandemonium over recent days, I recalled the book I was reading as Britain erupted in riots following the Southport murders last July. Written by Australian ex-soldier and military consultant David Kilcullen, The Dragons and the Snakes explores the tactics used by anti-Western states such as Russia, and para-states such as Isis and Hezbollah, since the end of the Cold War.

Kilcullen argues that the West grew complacent after defeating the large, slow-moving “dragon” of the Soviet Union. It was therefore slow to notice its replacement by a swarm of nimbler, smaller enemy “snakes”. These, he argues, have kept up pressure on the West, usually by operating just below a level of hostility that would become legible in Western terms as “war”.

Kilcullen characterises the core strategy as “liminal warfare”: a bundle of hybrid or “grey zone” tactics that ride on the edge of detectable, attributable hostility. Liminal warfare seeks to exploit the gap between realising an attack is planned, and being able either to take action or prove who is to blame for it.

An attack may appear as a “lone wolf” act of terrorism, information warfare, or perhaps DDoS (distributed denial-of-service) assaults on IT systems or other infrastructure sabotage. By the time anyone figures out who is to blame, the actors themselves have moved on, leaving chaos in their wake.

- Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim

COMMENT | Whenever Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim talks about young people, I recall the way he lectured that young girl on the bumiputera quota system in education.

The key is when Anwar talked about “fairness” to this young girl, he implied that by virtue of her ethnicity and her question, she was victimising the Malay community.

It was such a sight that even Bersatu got into the action of throwing shade at the prime minister.

Sasha Lyna Abdul Latif, the deputy chairperson of Bersatu’s legal and constitutional bureau, reportedly said, “He must apologise and make amends so that it is clear to all that every Malaysian child or student is important and every one of them must be cherished and treated with respect.”

I remember when Anwar presided over the conversion of a Hindu youth. By doing so, he was in fact representing the religious reality that non-Muslims face in this country. He was not merely welcoming a new convert into the religion, he was reinforcing religious narratives.

The prime minister lectures the West on democratic values and principles. He sees fit to remind young Malaysians to stand up against religious bigotry and corruption. What message did it send young Malaysians when he justified the DNAAs and dropped corruption charges against those in his cabinet?

Political and social life for young Malaysians is defined by constitutional provisions that are manipulated by Malay power structures to maintain racial and religious hegemony at the expense of minorities.

This is why Anwar referenced the Constitution which guarantees the rights of the majority. If people really thought about it, they would be asking what rights do the majority have that the minorities do not? But of course, nobody brings this up in polite company.

Veteran 1972 : Ka, ka, ka, the greatest practicing of religious and racial bigotry, starting with converting a Hindu and talking down to an Indian student who asked about apartheid in the Malaysian Education practices. What a hypocrite!!!

PJ Media : Islam gets criticized for so many things; however, it's important for non-Muslims to differentiate between those many doctrines that affect Muslims only and those much fewer doctrines — three to be exact — that affect the non-Muslim.

It is only the latter, which I detail in the video above, that should ultimately concern the non-Muslim.

The announcement of Husham al-Husainy, imam of the Karbalaa Islamic Educational Center in Dearborn, Michigan, as one of four religious leaders delivering a benediction at President Donald Trump’s second inauguration on January 20 has ignited a firestorm of outrage. This controversial decision has shocked many and raised pressing questions about the Trump administration’s failure to vet or comprehend the terror ties of this polarizing figure. Al-Husainy’s past is not merely a matter of inflammatory rhetoric—it is a case study in open support for Islamic terrorism, virulent antisemitism, and the promotion of radical ideologies, such as Islam, which are incompatible with Western values.

The Radical Background of Al-Husainy

Al-Husainy’s selection has drawn sharp rebukes due to his documented history of antisemitism, ties to Islamic terror organizations, and incendiary Islamic rhetoric. Journalists and commentators have pointed out that al-Husainy is not just any imam; he is a polarizing radical figure whose past actions and statements align with Islamic terrorists and run counter to American values. 

A Troubling History of Terror Support

Imam Husham al-Husainy is no stranger to controversy. He has a well-documented record of supporting groups like Hezbollah and the Houthi rebels, both of which are designated terrorist organizations. During rallies in Dearborn, Michigan, he openly displayed his support for Hezbollah, at one point holding aloft a picture of the group’s leader, Hassan Nasrallah, according to a Middle East Forum report.

I hadn’t heard from Dr Jasser in a good while. I wrote about his views here in the December 2017 issue of Quadrant magazine (“Reformist Pipedreams, Islamic Reality, and Muslim Accountability”). Alas, he obviously didn’t read my article, remains divorced from reality and, sadly, as ignorant as ever.

I will come to his views further on. First to Levin. He was talking about the events in New Orleans and generally about the threat of Islamic terrorism and said: “We are not talking about all Muslims. Why would we?” This obligatory caveat is inserted into the lines of all conservative commentators when they are on air discussing or debating Islamic terrorism or Islamic hate preaching. I assume they have no choice in the matter. Gotta say it to stay on air. I don’t buy it.

Rabble rousers need a mob. To extend that concept. Hamas could not thrive unless a sizeable proportion of Gazans supported them. Let me turn it around. If you’re club’s constitution allows its members to refer to Jews as pigs and apes, is it still okay to sip your gin sling in the club bar?

Muslims all belong to a religion whose constitution (i.e., scripture) is hateful towards Jews in particular and towards all non-believers in general. Keep in mind, religious affiliation is a choice, at least in non-Islamic countries. It is not like race or ethnicity which can’t be changed. Therefore the choice of following Islam is open to criticism. And, however peaceful and moderate you are, signing up to a creed which entertains discrimination and violence gives spiritual succour to those who act out that discrimination and violence. As to that antisemitic club I mentioned above, you need to resign your membership lest you be justifiably tarred by association. Now to Dr Jasser.

Jasser is an American Muslim of Syrian parents, a practicing physician, a former officer in the US Navy and, so far as I can tell, an all-round (if wide-eyed) good guy. He is the Founder and President of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy and Co-Founder of the Muslim Reform Movement (MRM). He wants to change Islam (hook, line, and sinker) from what it is to what he would like it to be. To rid Islam of the bad bits — what he calls Islamism or political Islam. Without a shadow of doubt, he is an unrivalled fantasiser.

In 2015, Jasser along with another twelve disenchanted Muslims or former Muslims, from across North America and Europe, signed and pinned a copy of a two-page MRM “Declaration” to the doors of the Islamic Centre in Washington DC; à la Martin Luther and the Castle Church in Wittenberg.

However, unlike Luther’s ninety-five theses, the MRM’s Declaration died abandoned in a ditch. Unsurprisingly! From an Islamic standpoint it is heresy on stilts. It has no comparability with Luther’s modest aim of ridding the Catholic Church of indulgences as payment for sins. This is where Jasser’s ignorance shows itself. As, did Aayan Hirsi Ali’s in her book Heretic (2015). They both seem to believe that the Protestant Reformation revolutionised Christianity. It did no such thing.

Luther simply wanted the Church to act more in keeping with scripture and with Saint Paul’s injunction that we could not gain redemption through our own works but through the grace of God alone. The Reformation subsequently produced geo-political effects but did not change, nor did it seek to change, any of the essential elements of the Christian faith. And it has not done so. The Bible remains the same, word for word.

In stark contrast with Luther’s limited objective, each of the propositions in the MRM Declaration (some 25 or so all told) strike at the heart of Islam. I have randomly picked out four of them to illustrate how they conflict with extracts from the Koran (Pickthall translation).

“We support equal rights and dignity for all people, including minorities.”

So, choose not friends from among them [disbelievers]…if they turn back to enmity [apostates] then take them and kill them wherever ye find them, and choose no friend or helper from among them (4:89) Slay the idolaters wherever ye find them (9.5) Mohammed is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves (48:29)

“We reject violent jihad.”

I will throw fear into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Then smite their necks and smite of them each finger (8:12)

“Every individual has the right to publicly express criticism of Islam.”

Those who disbelieve… are a folk without intelligence (8:65) Fight against those who have been given the scripture as believe not…until they pay the tribute [jizya] readily, being brought low (9:29)

“We support equal rights for women, including equal rights to inheritance.”

Men are in charge of women…good women are obedient…As for those who you fear rebellion…banish them to beds apart and scourge them (4:34) And call to witness, from among men, two witnesses. And if two men be not at hand then a man and two women (2:282) Allah chargeth you concerning the provision for your children: to the male the equivalent of the portion of two females (4:11)

It would be possible to go on and on. The discordance between the Declaration and Islamic scripture is vast. Jasser likely still has his head because he is not taken seriously by any imam, mufti, or ayatollah. Once Islam is ridded of so-called Islamism nothing much remains. It is instructive to compare Jasser’s prescription with Hirsi Ali’s; which she summarises as follows:

In a joint press statement entitled ‘Stop Forcing Our Faith: Sabah and Sarawak Demand Respect for Religious Freedom’, the organisation said they are outraged and deeply appalled by the allegations against UiTM.

“This is not just an attack on the religious freedom of our people – it is an affront to the dignity, identity, and autonomy of Sabah and Sarawak.

“Let us be clear: Sabah and Sarawak formed Malaysia under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) with the assurance that our religious and cultural rights would be respected. What we are seeing now is a blatant betrayal of that promise.

“These allegations — if true — prove that the federal government and institutions like UiTM have no regard for the feelings or beliefs of the indigenous people of Sabah and Sarawak,” the societies claimed in a statement.

They said UiTM was created to support Bumiputera students, not to impose religious conformity. The societies stressed non-Muslim students should not be subjected to dakwah programmes or any kind of forced religious indoctrination.

“It is deeply offensive to the followers of other religions in Sabah and Sarawak who are now being treated as second-class citizens in their own homeland. “How dare the federal government allow this kind of disrespect to persist? Have they forgotten that Sabah and Sarawak are equal partners in Malaysia, not colonies to be manipulated? Do the leaders in Putrajaya not understand that our people’s trust and goodwill are being shattered by such actions?” said the statement.

The groups demanded an immediate and public explanation from Minister of Higher Education Datuk Seri Zambry Abdul Kadir on the issue. “What are you doing to protect the constitutional rights of non-Muslim Bumiputera students? Enough is enough. The people of Sabah and Sarawak will not stand by while our cultural and religious identity is systematically undermined,” the group said.

“This is not just about religion – it is about respect, fairness, and the future of Malaysia as a multicultural nation. We demand justice, accountability, and an end to this blatant disregard for the feelings and rights of other religious communities in Sabah and Sarawak.”

The statement was signed by Global Human Rights Federation Malaysia deputy president Peter John Jaban; Borneo’s Plight in Malaysia Foundation president Daniel John Jambun; Sabah Sarawak Rights Australia New Zealand president Robert Pei; Republic of Sabah North Borneo president Moses Anap; Persatuan Pembangunan Sosial Komuniti Sabah president Jovilis Majami; Pertubuhan Kebajikan Rumpun Dayak Sabah president Cleftus Stephen Mojingol; and Forum Adat Dataran Tanah Tinggi Borneo advisor Ricky Ganang.

The issue has also caught the attention of Michael Kong – special assistant to Sarawak Democratic Action Party chairman Chong Chieng Jen – and human rights activist and lawyer Siti Kasim.

Author Preeta Samarasan recently claimed on Facebook that non-Muslim UiTM students were being forced to attend Islamic events and alleged UiTM required students in certain degree programmes to fulfil a conversion quota before they can graduate.

Extermination Camps

The Holocaust, known in Hebrew as the Shoah

By summer 1942, deportations were systematic across those parts of Europe occupied by the Nazis. The convoys which arrived in Auschwitz-Birkenau came from Poland, but also from western and southern Europe. Hitler issued an order for all Polish Jews to be killed before December 1942.

The United States refused to publish an official denunciation of the extermination of Europe’s Jews, despite being well informed by clandestine reports and alerted by telegrams. News of the Soviet victory in Stalingrad reached the Warsaw ghetto.The course of the war was starting to tip in the Allies’ favor, and the Third Reich’s armies were being pushed back.

For the survivors of the ghetto, there was nothing left to lose. In April 1943, the ghetto rose up. In August, then in October 1943, the prisoners in Treblinka and Sobibor revolted. But Himmler ordered the units of Special Action 1005 to erase all trace of the genocide in the extermination camps. On the morning of 3 November 1943, the liquidation of the Majdanek camp began: Jews were shot dead in ditches.

By nightfall, 18,000 people had died. In all the death camps, the men of Special Action 1005 disinterred bodies and built huge pyres, grinding the ashes so no trace remained. The gas chambers, the crematoriums, the shacks; everything was destroyed. The Allied advance pushed ahead at greater pace and Hungary considered switching sides and joining them.

In March 1944, the Wehrmacht occupied the country, and the deportation of 437,000 Hungarian Jews to Auschwitz began several weeks later. As the noose tightened on the Nazi regime, caught between the Red Army to the east and to the west by the Anglo-Americans who had landed in Normandy in June 1944, many camps were evacuated between August and November of that year, amid scenes of untold chaos and violence.

When the Red Army entered Auschwitz, Treblinka and Majdanek, the camps had ceased to operate and were practically empty; only those too weak to have been “evacuated” were still there. In the eyes of certain high-ranking Nazis like Himmler, salvation was now a matter of negotiating a surrender, but the opportunity quickly evaporated. Hitler then Goebbels committed suicide, as the Red Army entered Berlin.

On 8 May, Germany surrendered unconditionally, and the Third Reich was at an end. Himmler was captured at the end of May by the British and also committed suicide. With the end of the Second World War, the Allies began to organize the return of prisoners of war and deportees. Fewer than 1,000 people survived the death camps of Chelmno, Treblinka, Belzec, and Sobibor, out of 1.85 million deported.