Know Thine Enemy By Mark Steyn
Major Hasan is honest about himself; why aren’t we?
On December 7, 1941, the U.S. naval base at
Pearl Harbor was attacked. Three years, eight months, and eight days
later, the Japanese surrendered. These days, America’s military moves at
a more leisurely pace. On November 5, 2009, another U.S. base, Fort
Hood, was attacked — by one man standing on a table, screaming “Allahu
akbar!” and opening fire. Three years, nine months, and one day later,
his court-martial finally got under way.
The intervening
third-of-a-decade-and-more has apparently been taken up by such vital
legal questions as the fullness of beard Major Hasan is permitted to
sport in court. This is not a joke: See “Judge Ousted in Fort Hood
Shooting Case amid Beard Debacle” (CBS News). Army regulations require
soldiers to be clean-shaven. The judge, Colonel Gregory Gross, ruled
Hasan’s beard in contempt, fined him $1,000, and said he would be
forcibly shaved if he showed up that hirsute next time.
At which point
Hasan went to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, which
ruled that Colonel Gross’s pogonophobia raised questions about his
impartiality, and removed him. He’s the first judge in the history of
American jurisprudence to be kicked off a trial because of a “beard
debacle.”
The new judge, Colonel Tara Osborn, agreed that Hasan’s beard
was a violation of regulations, but “said she won’t hold it against
him.”Major Hasan is a Virginia-born army psychiatrist and a recipient of the Pentagon’s Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, which seems fair enough, since he certainly served in it, albeit for the other side. Most Americans think he’s nuts. He thinks Americans are nuts. It’s a closer call than you’d think.
In the immediate aftermath of his attack, the U.S. media, following their iron-clad rule that “Allahu akbar” is Arabic for “Nothing to see here,” did their best to pass off Major Hasan as the first known victim of pre-Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. “It comes at a time when the stress of combat has affected so many soldiers,” fretted Andrew Bast in a report the now defunct Newsweek headlined, “A Symptom of a Military on the Brink.”
Major Hasan has never been in combat. He is not, in fact, a soldier. He is a shrink.
The soldiers in this story are the victims, some 45 of them. And the only reason a doctor can gun down nearly four dozen trained warriors (he was eventually interrupted by a civilian police officer, Sergeant Kimberly Munley, with a 9mm Beretta) is that soldiers on base are forbidden from carrying weapons. That’s to say, under a 1993 directive a U.S. military base is effectively a gun-free zone, just like a Connecticut grade school.
That’s a useful tip: If you’re mentally ill and looking to shoot up a movie theater at the next Batman premiere, try the local barracks — there’s less chance of anyone firing back.
Read it all here at The National Review
No comments:
Post a Comment
I do not aim to please anyone. This is my blog, there is no blog like this. I am not mainstream. Read my disclaimer before posting comments and threatening me. Not to worry, I will not quiver in my boots. If you are not happy, no problem, just take a hike!!