Congressman provokes outrage by saying ‘the choice between dogs and Muslims is not a difficult one’

Robert Spencer :   Outrage against Rep. Randy Fine is the left’s outrage du jour, with the fact that he was responding to Nerdeen Kiswani’s call for the banning of dogs in New York City (a “joke,” she says now) often left unmentioned.

California Gov. Gavin Newscum was the first to charge Fine with “racism.” Like virtually all leftists, Newscum doggedly pretends that Islam is a race or Muslims are all of one race. In reality, there are Muslims, and Islamic jihadis, of all races.

Over 80% of Muslims believe this, which is against the constitution of the USA

And what everyone who is charging Fine with “Islamophobia” and “bigotry” is ignoring is the fact that Islamic law, Sharia, is political, supremacist, expansionary, and violent. If we continue to ignore this fact, we will be subsumed under its hegemony, and our new overlords will not hesitate to engage in acts against us that leftists term “bigotry” today, but won’t be doing so then.

Also, there are the obvious rejoinders to all the faux outrage over Fine’s statement: dogs never flew any planes into buildings, women don’t have to fear rape by dogs when they go out at night, dogs aren’t declaring their imminent takeover and the subjugation of the natives, and on and on. No leftist, of course, will acknowledge any of that. 

In raging at Fine, they’re busy pretending that Islam is no more dangerous than Methodism, and that it’s all about disliking “brown people.” This strategy will backfire on them, and it will do so, paradoxically, right at its moment of victory, when leftists discover, to their horror, that the “Islamophobes” were right, and the leftists themselves are the next jihadi target.  “Republican congressman’s anti-Muslim remark prompts calls for his resignation,” by Ben Kamisar, NBC News, February 16.

Thinker1 says : Yes, an easy choice. My dog didn’t threaten to kill me if I didn’t become a dog.

Read it all here......