Rudyard Kipling"
āWhen you're left wounded on Afganistan's plains and
the women come out to cut up what remains, Just roll to your rifle
and blow out your brains,
And go to your God like a soldierā
General Douglas MacArthur"
āWe are not retreating. We are advancing in another direction.ā
āIt is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it.ā āOld soldiers never die; they just fade away.
āThe soldier, above all other people, prays for peace, for he must suffer and be the deepest wounds and scars of war.ā
āMay God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't .ā āThe object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his.
āNobody ever defended, there is only attack and attack and attack some more.
āIt is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God that such men lived.
The Soldier stood and faced God
Which must always come to pass
He hoped his shoes were shining
Just as bright as his brass
"Step forward you Soldier,
How shall I deal with you?
Have you always turned the other cheek?
To My Church have you been true?"
"No, Lord, I guess I ain't
Because those of us who carry guns
Can't always be a saint."
I've had to work on Sundays
And at times my talk was tough,
And sometimes I've been violent,
Because the world is awfully rough.
But, I never took a penny
That wasn't mine to keep.
Though I worked a lot of overtime
When the bills got just too steep,
The Soldier squared his shoulders and said
And I never passed a cry for help
Though at times I shook with fear,
And sometimes, God forgive me,
I've wept unmanly tears.
I know I don't deserve a place
Among the people here.
They never wanted me around
Except to calm their fears.
If you've a place for me here,
Lord, It needn't be so grand,
I never expected or had too much,
But if you don't, I'll understand."
There was silence all around the throne
Where the saints had often trod
As the Soldier waited quietly,
For the judgment of his God.
"Step forward now, you Soldier,
You've borne your burden well.
Walk peacefully on Heaven's streets,
You've done your time in Hell."
Were Muslims more tolerant before Madani? By Commander S THAYAPARAN (Retired) Royal Malaysian Navy
Sunday, February 09, 2025
Malaysiakini : āFor centuries, we have lived and intermingled harmoniously. Muslims
are well aware of the doās and donāts of their religion - there is no
need for external dictates on our behaviour,ā
- Former minister Rafidah Aziz
CNN Host, Anderson Cooper Visibly FRIGHTENED as Trump Says The Truth About Islam
COMMENT |
To be clear, ātolerantā is an odious word that is indicative of how
fascistic lingual norms have become normalised in the Malaysian
political and social landscapes.
Democratic societies are
accepting or empathic of cultural and religious differences but
fascistic societies tolerate such differences in the pursuit of
compromised political stability.
Having said that, the question remains.
The recent announcement
of guidelines for Muslims attending non-Muslim religious events by the
prime ministerās religious czar was brazen in its disdain for religions
other than that of the religion of the state.
It
is a shocking display of the normalisation of demonising other
religions and the fact that it happened in Parliament should tell us
everything we need to know about the religious agenda of the state.
According
to the religious czar, non-Muslim religious events, symbols, and even
devotional music can offend Muslim sensitivities.
I have no idea
if this is contextual or a general statement. After all, why would
religious symbols for instance pose a threat to Muslim sensitivity in a
specific time and place, even though such symbols are ever present in
Malaysian life?
Now of course Madani has backtracked after the blowback this so-called policy received. But the damage has already been done.
The
question we should ask is where was the National Unity Minister Aaron
Ago Dagang when the religious czar first mooted this policy in
Parliament?
Here
we have the prime ministerās religious czar essentially calling
non-Muslim symbols and devotional practices as something that offends
Muslims sensitivities. What does this say about the kind of Islam Madani
advocates?
fookchin : The fake reformist chameleon has a propaganda Czar, an unelected religious Czar n several psycophant ministers in his permaidani cabinet. The unity minister Aaron anak Dagang, just like the DAP ministers , are only cari makan ministers who dare not n will not lock horns with the chameleon n the 2 czar ministers!
Let us vote them out in GE16 in favour of credible unblemished independent candidates. If there is no credible candidate in your area, stay put at home on the polling day n enjoy a longer sleep n a late breakfast
Koel : Thank you, firstly, for making that crucial distinction between tolerance and acceptance. If memory serves, this distinction was actually documented in policy papers under ex-PM Najib Razak, but then it was promptly disregarded.
And, definitely, the language employed in announcing the recent guidelines had very little to do with acceptance. Religious messages of non muslim religions were characterised as "propaganda". Whether this was the actual word used or whether it was a poor translation, was not clear.
But if indeed that was the actual word used, it was offensive and derogatory in the extreme, pointing to extreme intolerance and ignorance of those who crafted the message.
We must further assume that entire non muslim religious ceremonies whether in weddings, funerals or festivities were being deemed "offensive" in the proposed guidelines.
Mystifying, indeed. What on earth do they expect non muslims to do in their houses of worship? Sit in silent communion with the almighty for fear of "offending" some muslim present by praying, chanting or singing?
Were religious houses of worship also supposed to scramble to remove all signs and symbols of religious significance for fear of offending the muslim person attending the ceremony?
The language and guidelines were offensive and abhorrent.
It makes a mockery of these offices that pretend great knowledge and it makes a mockery of the stated objectives of harmony and unity. And to those who say that these are merely guidelines, please note that a written document is all some people or political parties need to oppress people.
In the midst of all this, the Unity minister appears genuinely clueless about his position. It appears he thinks his portfolio is to organise some fun events and fake unity carnivals, sing a couple of meaningless propaganda songs about how united we all are and then go his merry way.
How has he tackled deeply entrenched problems of unity, inclusiveness, belonging and harmony? What attempts has he made to instil an appreciation of the key concept of acceptance and belonging?
We have a major problem in this country, YB Aaron Ago. And if you are recruiting a department or a ministry or a govt or a civil service to help you address the problem, you need to ensure that they understand issues and concepts first.
Breaking barriers and building bridges has to be an ongoing endeavour. It would be the greatest pity if you continue to behave as if this is not your problem. In failing to do your duty, you create a society that is worse off for all of us.