Even though I was a 15-year-old schoolboy at the time, I remember the 7/7 attacks as if they were yesterday. Fifty-two people were murdered, with a further 784 injured, by four jihadists: Mohammad Sidique Khan, Shehzad Tanweer, Shehzad Tanweer and Germaine Lindsay. Three were British-born sons of Pakistani Muslim migrants, with the other being a Jamaica-born convert to Islam.

Today should not only be a day of remembrance, but also a timely reminder of the threat that continues to be posed by Islamist extremism – the principal terror threat the UK faces. Despite recent claims to the contrary, this is clearly borne out by the available data. The overwhelming majority of suspects on MI5’s terror watchlist are jihadists. The number of Islamist extremists on the watchlist – in the region of 40,000 – constitutes as many as one in a hundred Muslims in the UK. According to recent government figures, roughly two in three prisoners in custody for terrorism and terrorism-connected offences are Islamic extremists. The sheer scale of Britain’s Islamic-extremism problem was reinforced in January, when the United Arab Emirates placed eight UK-based organisations on its local terror list due to their alleged links with the Muslim Brotherhood, a Sunni Islamist organisation.

Yet instead of acknowledging the gravity of the Islamist threat in the UK, and challenging their own communities to repel Islamism, some Muslim identitarians have used the 20th anniversary of 7/7 to essentially pose as the ‘real’ victims of this atrocity. In a piece in the Guardian, Leeds-based imam Qari Asim is quoted as saying that ‘the emotional and social toll of 7/7 on Muslim communities was profound and is felt by many to this day’.

Similarly, Shabna Begum, the chief executive of the Runnymede Trust, an anti-racism think-tank, says that since 7/7, ‘Muslim communities have generally faced this kind of real culture of both being perceived as a threat and being perceived as outside the main body of who is to be British’. In the article, Begum also bemoans the extension of counter-terrorism powers in the wake of the atrocity, which she claims have been used to target Muslims unfairly.

The truth is that, far from deliberately victimising British Muslims, there is strong evidence that the authorities are fearful of being accused of ‘Islamophobia’ when dealing with those at risk of Islamist radicalisation. This is undoubtedly why there is such a mismatch between the ideological composition of cases referred to Prevent, the UK government’s counter-radicalisation scheme, and the wider terrorism picture. Cases of right-wing radicalisation referred to Prevent have, in recent years, significantly outnumbered Islamist-related referrals, despite the scale of the Islamist threat being significantly larger.