England’s
oldest national flag, the red cross of St. George on a white banner, is
currently embroiled in controversy — particularly amid the nation’s
ongoing migrant crisis.
The more some Britons raise it aloft, the more
others complain about it. For those flying
it, the flag represents pride in being English — reclaiming a symbol of
national unity, heritage, and patriotism, no different from when other
peoples display their own flags. Detractors, however — most of whom are
reflexively anti-English, even if they share English DNA — insist it is a
symbol of “far-right” extremism, racism, and xenophobia. To them, it
represents exclusion and hostility toward migrants, the overwhelming
majority of whom are Muslim.
The truth,
however, appears to lie in the middle. English patriots are indeed
rallying to their nation’s oldest flag as a collective act of defiance
against what they see as an Islamic migrant takeover — one in which
Muslims are being used to erode the nation, “groom” its women, and
suppress English (particularly Christian) culture and heritage.
Meanwhile,
both sides seem to be oblivious to the flag’s actual (and rather
ironic) origins: the St. George banner was forged in the crucible of
Christian warfare against Islam.
The Forgotten History of the Cross
The
St. George flag originated in the Middle Ages as both a military and
religious emblem inseparable from the Crusades. The Knights Templar,
founded in the early twelfth century, were the first to adopt it. As
monks, their white mantles symbolized purity; as warriors sworn to fight
Muslims to the death in defense of Christendom, the blood-red cross
symbolized their readiness for martyrdom (which many experienced).
In
the years after the Templars’ adoption, the symbol spread to other
crusaders. It soon became linked to St. George, a third-/fourth-century
Christian soldier martyred by the pagan Roman Empire for refusing to
renounce Christ. In medieval imagination, George became the very
embodiment of militant Christianity, a celestial knight who exemplified
the willingness to die for Christ in battle against Islam.
Indeed,
crusader chronicles repeatedly describe St. George appearing in visions
or even in battle. During the storming of Muslim-held Jerusalem in
1099, Raymond of Aguilers, an eyewitness of the First Crusade, recorded:
“The blessed George was seen in the army of Christ, fighting against
the Saracens and giving victory to the faithful.”
Nearly
a century later, during the Third Crusade (c. 1190), King Richard I —
the Lionheart — regularly invoked George as his patron saint. His men
likewise believed the warrior saint fought beside them. As one
contemporary chronicler put it: “Saint George, the standard-bearer of
the heavenly army, came to the aid of the Christians and overthrew the
enemies of the Cross.”
Another century on,
during the Ninth Crusade (c. 1270), Edward I — then a prince, later
king — was no less devoted. He “commended himself and his men to the
most blessed martyr George, whom he had ever taken as his special patron
in war,” in the words of the chronicler, Walter of Guisborough.
Returning
home, Edward I continued to elevate St. George as a symbol of chivalry,
courage, and holy war. His grandson, Edward III, expanded this
association further. By the mid-1300s, St. George and his banner — red
cross on white — had become inseparable from English identity itself: a
symbol of Christian England’s militant defense against external threats,
above all the Muslim enemy. For centuries, the warrior saint’s flag
inspired courage, chivalry, and an explicitly English sense of martial
faith.
Even the Enemy Feared Him
Because the flag originated with the Templars — who are the subject of my latest book, The Two Swords of Christ — let us close with a telling episode that shows how even Muslims feared St. George.
Please Support The Stream: Equipping Christians to Think Clearly About the Political, Economic, and Moral Issues of Our Day.
In
1187, near Nazareth, some 500 crusaders led by Templars were ambushed
by 7,000 Muslims. Though heavily outnumbered, they fought valiantly
until all were slain — except for one Templar knight. Offered the chance
to surrender, he refused, fighting on alone until he had made a ring of
Muslim corpses around him. The awed enemy, struck by his supernatural
courage, became convinced that he was none other than St. George.
The contemporary Itinerarium Peregrinorum records the scene in full:
While
the rest of his fellow knights (estimated to number 500) had either
been captured or killed, he bore all the force of the battle alone and
shone out as a glorious champion for the law of his God. He was
surrounded by enemy troops and almost abandoned by human aid, but when
he saw so many thousands running towards him from all directions he
strengthened his resolve and courageously undertook the battle, one man
against all.
It was indeed a gentle death with no place for
sorrow, when one man’s sword had constructed such a great crown for
himself from the [enemy] crowd laid all around him. Death is sweet when
the victor lies encircled by the impious people he has slain with his
victorious right hand. And because it so happened that the warrior had
been riding a white horse and had white armor and weapons, the Gentiles
[Muslims], who knew that St. George had this appearance in battle,
boasted that they had killed the Knight of Shining Armor, the protector
of the Christians.
The Deeper Meaning Today
Such
is the true origin of England’s St. George flag: forged in centuries of
warfare with, and martyrdom at the hands of, Muslims.
Incidentally,
that a Christian warrior saint is tied to a European nation’s long war
against Islam — in this case, England — should be unsurprising; the need
for such saints was ubiquitous across Christendom. One need only look
to Spain’s patron saint, St. James Matamoros; that is, St. James the
Moor — meaning, Muslim — Slayer.
The
point is this: the St. George flag speaks far more directly to
England’s present Muslim migrant crisis than most Englishmen who wave it
— or denounce it — can begin to comprehend. Put
differently, the St. George flag is not a symbol of xenophobic
paranoia, nor is it a mere relic of medieval piety:
It is a stark
reminder that those who forget history are destined to relive it.