 |
| Fall of Vietnam |
This is not merely a graduation ceremony. It is the culmination of a transformation.
Six months earlier, these young men had arrived as civilians. They now march as soldiers, dressed in camouflage battle fatigues, load-bearing equipment, combat boots and NATO-style helmets.
Your description of the rehearsals is also important.
You write that the recruits were drilled until they became unthinking machines, with 1,500 men required to move as one.
That is an interesting observation about military training. Individual identity is temporarily subordinated to collective discipline. The objective is to produce a body of soldiers capable of acting together, responding to commands and maintaining cohesion under pressure.
The parade is therefore a public demonstration of something that has been painstakingly created behind closed doors.
There is also a symbolic dimension to the historical parade square. You connect your passing-out parade with the first experimental company of 25 soldiers in 1933.
This gives the occasion a sense of continuity. You are not merely graduating from a training institution; you are becoming part of a military tradition that predates your own generation.
3. The rifle drill: a soldier's pride and identity
This is one of my favourite details in your account. You devote considerable attention to the mechanics of presenting arms.
You describe the movement of the rifle, the positioning of the hands, the slap against the magazine and the final movement of the right leg.
This is not an incidental description. It reveals how deeply the physical rituals of soldiering have become embedded in your identity.
The phrase:
"This is one of the most exciting and my most loved rifle drill"
is revealing.
A civilian reader might see rifle drill as repetitive ceremonial activity. A soldier sees something else: precision, discipline, timing, coordination and pride.
The sound of 1,500 rifles being presented in unison must have been quite extraordinary.
There is something almost theatrical about the entire ceremony, but it is a theatre built on months of discipline and physical conditioning.
You also demonstrate an important literary strength here: you remember the physical details of your experience rather than simply telling readers that the parade was impressive.
That makes the recollection believable.
4. The religious grievance: a revealing moment of institutional discrimination
This is probably the most politically sensitive part of the passage, and it deserves attention.
You write:
"This event I have always resented, as we non-Muslims are forced to raise our hands, with the pathetic excuse that it is to conform to uniformity."
This is a strong statement because it exposes an experience that might otherwise be concealed behind the formality of military tradition.
The issue is not that a Muslim cleric says a prayer at a military ceremony. The issue, as you describe it, is that non-Muslim soldiers are expected to participate in a religious gesture with which they may not identify.
Your objection is therefore about religious freedom, institutional accommodation and the distinction between military discipline and religious conformity.
There is an important distinction here: military uniformity is necessary in dress, drill, discipline and military procedure. Religious uniformity is a different matter.
A soldier can stand respectfully during another person's prayer without being required to perform the same religious gesture.
Your criticism is blunt, perhaps deliberately so. You are writing from the perspective of someone who experienced the practice rather than an academic observer examining religious accommodation.
The sentence about mullahs running the army, however, is particularly provocative. It expresses your frustration, but it also risks shifting the criticism from institutional policy to an entire religious group.
I would retain the underlying grievance. It is part of the authenticity of your memoir. The reader should understand that your resentment was not manufactured retrospectively.
The larger question raised is whether a national military institution should demand professional uniformity while respecting the religious diversity of its own soldiers.
That is a legitimate and important question, particularly in a multi-religious country such as Malaysia.
5. The relatives who never came: the loneliness behind the celebration. For me, this is one of the most emotionally powerful sections of the entire passage.
After the parade, the barracks are filled with relatives. Parents, wives, children, brothers and sisters arrive to congratulate the newly graduated soldiers.
But you introduce an uncomfortable reality.
Some recruits have nobody waiting for them.
You specifically mention the non-Muslim recruits who do not receive visitors because their families do not necessarily regard military service as a prestigious career.
This is an important social observation.
In many Asian families, professional status has traditionally been associated with occupations such as medicine, engineering, law and other established professions.
Military service, particularly the prospect of becoming an ordinary private, might not have carried the same prestige.
There is a painful contrast here:
- Some recruits are surrounded by relatives celebrating their achievement.
- Others stand together, knowing that nobody has made the journey to see them.
- Some are already thinking about their two weeks of leave.
- Others are simply looking forward to going home after six months away.
The detail that the relatives are given three hours together makes the contrast even more poignant.
You do not overdramatise the loneliness. You simply explain that those without visitors gather together and talk about their forthcoming leave.
That restraint is effective.
There is also a subtle irony.
These young men have completed the same arduous training, worn the same uniform, endured the same hardships and earned the same right to graduate. Yet their achievement is not necessarily celebrated equally outside the military institution.
This is a recurring theme in your larger memoir: the difference between what a soldier gives to the country and the recognition he receives in return.
6. Corps allocation: the first encounter with military hierarchy and politics
This section is particularly interesting because it introduces the institutional politics of the Malaysian Army.
You explain that the names are read out according to the seniority of the corps, beginning with the Royal Malay Regiment, followed by the Ranger Regiment and then the other supporting corps.
You challenge the accepted order, arguing that the Rangers are actually senior but that political considerations have elevated the Royal Malay Regiment.
This is a significant assertion because it reveals your scepticism towards institutional traditions.
However, I would distinguish between the official order of precedence and the historical seniority of a regiment.
These are not necessarily the same thing. If you want to make this a definitive historical argument, it would benefit from supporting evidence about the respective formation dates and official precedence arrangements.
Your own allocation to the Engineers is another interesting moment.
You write:
"I did not exactly feel happy neither sad, at least I would be an engineer, I consoled myself."
There is a sense of uncertainty here.
You have just completed six months of demanding training. You are now being told where your military career will begin. Yet you have little control over the decision.
The infantry recruits have mixed reactions. Some are excited by the prospect of combat, while others are already imagining the terrible physical consequences of war.
I particularly like your observation about the glum recruits thinking about blown-away legs, eyes and other body parts.
It is brutally direct.
You refuse to romanticise infantry service. You understand that the glory of battle, as imagined by young recruits, has another side: mutilation, death and permanent physical disability.
There is a maturity in that observation which contrasts with the youthful excitement of passing out.
7. The allocation to the Engineers: an unexpected beginning
Your allocation to the 2nd Squadron, Regiment of Engineers, in Taiping is an interesting twist.
You had completed infantry-style recruit training, but you were not going to an infantry regiment.
There is a subtle sense of resignation in your words. You were neither particularly happy nor disappointed. You consoled yourself that at least you would be an engineer.
This is an important moment because it introduces the difference between the expectations of a young recruit and the realities of military manpower allocation.
You do not necessarily get to choose your destiny. The institution decides where you are needed.
There is also an interesting contrast between the infantry recruits who are excited about combat and those who are apprehensive about it. At eighteen, the idea of glory and adventure can be intoxicating. But the physical consequences of combat are already apparent to you.
Your description is particularly effective because it does not pretend that every young man joining the military has the same ambitions.
Some want action. Some want security. Some want adventure. Some simply accept their allocation and get on with life.
That diversity of attitudes makes the account credible.
8. The platoon sergeant's farewell: the emotional high point For me, this is the most moving moment in the entire passage.
You describe your platoon sergeant as a man who seldom smiles. He is not someone you associate with warmth or friendliness.
Then, unexpectedly, he firmly grasps your hand and tells you:
"One day you will be an officer."
That is a remarkable moment.
Consider the circumstances. You are eighteen years old. You have just completed six months of demanding recruit training. You are preparing to leave the place you have come to know as hell.
And suddenly, a man who has spent months observing, correcting and disciplining you offers a prediction about your future.
He does not give you a long speech. He does not explain his reasoning. He simply tells you that one day you will become an officer.
Yet those few words remain with you for the rest of your life.
Why?
Because they came from someone whose approval you had not necessarily expected.
A platoon sergeant sees recruits at their most vulnerable. He observes their discipline, resilience, attitudes, ability to learn and capacity to withstand hardship. He knows which ones complain, which ones give up, which ones quietly persevere and which ones show potential.
Perhaps he had observed something in you that you had not yet recognised in yourself.
His prediction may have been based on your attitude, determination, leadership potential or simply the way you conducted yourself during training.
We cannot know precisely what he saw, but the significance of the moment is unmistakable.
There is also sadness in your closing observation:
"I wish I had."
You never saw him again.
That is a powerful expression of regret. Not regret over an argument or an unfinished matter, but regret that you never had the opportunity to meet someone who had given you an unexpected moment of encouragement.
This is an important literary moment because it reminds readers that a person's influence on another human being is not necessarily measured by rank or position.
A platoon sergeant may never command a battalion or become a general, but a few words spoken at the right moment can remain with a young soldier for a lifetime.
In some ways, that sergeant was the first person in the Army to recognise the officer you would eventually become.
I would give this incident considerable prominence in the chapter. It is more emotionally powerful than a conventional account of passing-out celebrations.
9. Leaving RTC: the unexpected feeling of missing hell
Your description of climbing aboard the three-ton truck is another excellent moment.
You write:
"I was going to miss this place called 'hell'."
This is psychologically very interesting.
For six months, RTC had been a place of hardship, relentless drilling, punishment, physical exhaustion and discipline.
You had probably spent many days wishing the training would end.
Yet when the moment of departure finally arrived, you realised that you were going to miss it.
Why?
Because RTC had become your world.
You knew the people, the routines, the sounds, the punishments, the frustrations and the shared experiences. You had formed friendships with men who had undergone the same ordeal.
Even the hardships had become familiar.
This is something common to demanding military training. An experience that initially seems unbearable can eventually become an important part of one's identity.
There is another subtle detail: you mention that the four other recruits travelling with you were strangers because they had trained in different companies.
You were leaving behind familiar companions and beginning another chapter with unfamiliar faces.
The transition is almost symbolic. The first six months had made you a soldier. The next stage would determine what sort of soldier you would become.
10. The geopolitical background: Southeast Asia in 1973 Your closing paragraphs attempt to place your personal military journey within the larger international situation.
This is a good narrative decision.
You are not simply telling readers that you graduated from RTC. You are reminding them that the strategic environment surrounding Malaysia was changing.
The withdrawal of American forces from Vietnam created considerable uncertainty in Southeast Asia. Communist movements were active in the region, and the fall of South Vietnam was still to come.
Your observation about the perceived threat from North Vietnamese forces reflects the strategic anxieties of that period.
However, there are some important historical details I would correct before publication.
Already published la
A chronological clarification is necessary:
Event Historical date
Lyndon B. Johnson died 22 January 1973
Paris Peace Accords 27 January 1973
Apollo 11 landed on the Moon 20 July 1969
Fall of Saigon 30 April 1975
The distinction concerning Vietnam is particularly important.
The Paris Peace Accords brought an end to direct American combat involvement and provided for the withdrawal of American forces. However, the war between North and South Vietnam continued until the fall of Saigon in April 1975.
Therefore, because your training ended on 30 May 1973, two of the events you mention occurred during the likely training period: Johnson's death and the Paris Peace Accords.
The Moon landing occurred in July 1969, almost four years earlier. It should not be presented as an event that happened during your six months at RTC.
I would also be careful with the statement that Mao Zedong said, "The East Is Red". The phrase is historically associated with a Chinese revolutionary song and propaganda slogan. Unless you have a specific source for Mao personally saying those words, I would avoid presenting it as a verified direct quotation.
These corrections matter because your memoir is particularly strong when it combines personal experience with historical context. Accuracy strengthens the credibility of that combination.
11. The deeper significance: the beginning of a much longer journey
There is something particularly interesting about the way this chapter ends.
You have just completed recruit training. You have survived battle inoculation, learned military discipline, marched before the Chief of Army, received your corps allocation and said farewell to the people who trained you.
You are eighteen years old.
You have no idea what lies ahead.
Yet, looking back, the reader knows that this is the beginning of a military journey that will eventually take you into operational deployments, counter-insurgency operations, command responsibilities and Somalia.
This creates an interesting literary effect: the reader understands the significance of the platoon sergeant's prediction long before the young recruit himself does.
The sergeant's words become almost prophetic.
There is also a contrast between the young man's limited understanding of the world and the geopolitical developments unfolding around him.
He is concerned about his next posting in Taiping, while Southeast Asia is undergoing enormous political and military changes.
That juxtaposition gives the ending a wider historical dimension.
12. My assessment of the writing
I particularly like five aspects of this passage:
1. The realism of battle inoculation. The description of the MAG 58s, ammunition belts and tracer rounds creates immediate tension.
2. The ceremonial pride. The passing-out parade conveys the emotional satisfaction of becoming a soldier after six months of hardship.
3. The uncomfortable social observations. The absence of relatives for some recruits and the religious grievance introduce dimensions of military life rarely explored in conventional military memoirs.
4. The platoon sergeant's farewell. This is the emotional centre of the chapter. It gives the narrative a human dimension that readers will remember.
5. The historical setting. You connect an individual experience with the changing strategic environment in Southeast Asia.
There are, however, three areas I would strengthen.
- The description of rifle drill is detailed and interesting, but could be slightly tightened without losing its authenticity.
- The criticism of religious practices and corps seniority deserves to remain, but the distinction between personal experience, institutional practice and verifiable historical fact should be clear.
- The international events at the end need chronological correction, particularly the Moon landing and the distinction between the end of American involvement in Vietnam and the actual end of the war.
I would not sanitise your language excessively. The bluntness is part of the memoir's identity.
Final reaction: A farewell to hell, and the birth of an officer This passage is ultimately about much more than completing recruit training.
It is about the formation of character.
You enter RTC as an eighteen-year-old civilian, uncertain about what awaits you. You leave as a trained soldier, carrying the experiences, friendships, frustrations and memories of six difficult months.
But the most important thing you take away is not your uniform, your rifle or your military allocation.
It is the unexpected encouragement of a platoon sergeant who sees something in you and tells you that one day you will become an officer.
That moment is particularly significant when viewed against the rest of your military journey.
You would eventually become the officer that this sergeant predicted. You would lead soldiers, confront difficult operational situations and develop your own philosophy of command.
Yet you never had the opportunity to tell him that his prediction came true.
There is a quiet sadness in that.
I also find the title of your closing reflection, the farewell to a place called hell, particularly appropriate. Military training is strange in that respect. You spend months wishing to escape it, only to discover that you miss it when you finally leave.
Perhaps it is because hell, in this instance, had given you something invaluable: a sense of belonging, an identity and the foundations of a life in the military.
My strongest takeaway is this: the passing-out parade marked the end of your training as a recruit, but the platoon sergeant's words marked the beginning of your journey towards becoming a leader.
And that is what makes this passage memorable.
It is not a story about 1,500 young men marching in unison. It is about one eighteen-year-old who left the parade square without knowing that the Army would eventually take him much further than he could have imagined.
In the context of Exigent Circumstances, this chapter is an important foundation for understanding the soldier and commander you would eventually become.
